From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: 'bzr init-repo .' crashes for lack of module bz2. Help, please! Date: Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:16:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87bphbf3zy.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> References: <20091228170401.GA4553@muc.de> <4B3939AB.7070501@harpegolden.net> <20091229200832.GA5097@muc.de> <20091229205734.GB5097@muc.de> <4B3A957B.9050106@harpegolden.net> <20091231120648.GA2801@muc.de> <4B3CD9A9.9030705@harpegolden.net> <20100103173342.GA1653@muc.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262542629 9622 80.91.229.12 (3 Jan 2010 18:17:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2010 18:17:09 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 03 19:17:01 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NRV0c-0007Ue-Id for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:16:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39205 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRV0c-0004QY-Nm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:16:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRV0X-0004Po-KM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:16:53 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NRV0T-0004Op-Qk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:16:53 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37039 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NRV0T-0004Oi-NS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:34267) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRV0T-0007yo-Gc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:16:49 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD23C94A0 for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:16:47 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 03 Jan 2010 13:16:47 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=b1uAN5vYM1fie36f6yMYwGyKlVw=; b=tkcn5+R/2/fLWU+oBaQe9Mnf21vkbWzWUCHpeJ2XmaF6gjLCN73Tg5waigoLLuLf2MIQSfEvd8Qls7p6NWAlUjN5Iy6kqKeo7AS6W7INJl0s71AwkZA9rgPQov/JkTZuLoLLkfEFrCn9Gs3wW2HuS8vlQ8B8kZ8k2bLlPSh/lFM= X-Sasl-enc: b+HyYolRBZE+o7BH1vaZlBjCkHpO33h6q0yQPOLToC7g 1262542606 Original-Received: from thinkpad.tsdh.de (p54AF3D63.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.175.61.99]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 42AA34A4F3B for ; Sun, 3 Jan 2010 13:16:45 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20100103173342.GA1653@muc.de> (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Sun, 3 Jan 2010 17:33:42 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119316 Archived-At: Alan Mackenzie writes: Hi Alan, > I've now got bzip2, Python and bzr installed and talking to each > other, such that I can carry on with the BzrForEmacsDevs on the Emacs > wiki. Thanks! I'm just curious, but why didn't you just reinstall your system instead of working around your broken package manager, thereby deferring that task only a bit into the future? I'd go nuts with such a severely broken system. :-) Bye, Tassilo