From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: imagemmagick patch 5 Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2010 15:02:15 +0900 Message-ID: <87bpf2ugwo.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267855769 4034 80.91.229.12 (6 Mar 2010 06:09:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2010 06:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: joakim@verona.se, Emacs development discussions To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 06 07:09:22 2010 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnnCU-0003xZ-6f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:09:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NnnCS-0002Na-V1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:09:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NnnCL-0002MY-5f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:09:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46279 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NnnCI-0002L4-Pj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:09:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnnCH-0004yM-I9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:09:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:57764) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NnnCH-0004xg-AB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:09:09 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F4761537B2; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 14:51:36 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 592A21A382A; Sat, 6 Mar 2010 15:02:15 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" a03421eb562b XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121673 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > It's no big problem. Now that we accept and use prototypes, there > probably aren't any compiler that can compile Emacs but does not accept > // comments. IIRC, C89 compilers accept prototypes but not // comments. In any case, XEmacs has required prototype support for a decade but some compilers that can compile XEmacs blow up on // comments. I'm not even sure when/if GCC started accepting them by default. I think you need to require C99 (or possibly GNU extensions) to get // comments.