From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: support for git commit --amend/--signoff Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:04:11 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <87bpaukhxd.fsf@mail.jurta.org> References: <87hblavx6f.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <874oh94kdh.fsf@gmail.com> <87y6e2xfv8.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1277759790 18058 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2010 21:16:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 21:16:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 28 23:16:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTLgk-000243-2z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 23:16:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54252 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTLgj-0004u3-18 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:16:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=41531 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OTLgY-0004rv-4G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:16:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTLgX-0002Kq-42 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:16:10 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out1.starman.ee ([85.253.0.3]:52535 helo=mx1.starman.ee) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OTLgT-0002Ja-8B; Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:16:05 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavisd-New at mx1.starman.ee Original-Received: from mail.starman.ee (82.131.92.56.cable.starman.ee [82.131.92.56]) by mx1.starman.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650E23F409D; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 00:16:01 +0300 (EEST) In-Reply-To: <87y6e2xfv8.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sat, 26 Jun 2010 12:11:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:126484 Archived-At: > That way, one can use Stefan's method by default, but rather > transparently move to as much of Dan's method as one likes. I wonder if, for instance, I'd like to bind `C-c C-c' to a command that asks for confirmation of command line arguments in the minibuffer, would it be possible to implement such a command with Stefan's method or Dan's method? -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/