From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: What is emacs architecture ? Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:19:34 +0900 Message-ID: <87bpa2zq55.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <20100707.150746.549331509773933118.yamato@redhat.com> <87aaq3qpo7.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <8739vvxkqr.fsf@escher.home> <8739vvoyak.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87tyoas9o4.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87iq4p6fj2.fsf@kslab.red-bean.com> <87r5iz4jn2.fsf@telefonica.net> <930432A0-2110-4A31-88B6-BFB35D07380F@mit.edu> <87iq4azyvs.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87hbju506n.fsf@telefonica.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279603108 21221 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2010 05:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 05:18:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D3scar?= Fuentes Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 20 07:18:25 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob5Dh-0001v3-M8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 07:18:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34329 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob5Dg-00054G-Tu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:18:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46403 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ob5DZ-000546-BA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:18:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob5DY-00077I-9s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:18:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:36475) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ob5DY-000779-0N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:18:12 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49641535AF; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:18:09 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 772071A26B9; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 14:19:34 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87hbju506n.fsf@telefonica.net> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" ed3b274cc037 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:127603 Archived-At: =D3scar Fuentes writes: > This is (hopefully) right for the commits made since the transition from > cvs to bzr, but the revisions imported from cvs (which are about 98% of > the VCS history) have no such guarantee of consistency. No guarantee, but a very high likelihood. I simply assess the likelihood of a non-atomic CVS commit causing problems to be on the same order of magnitude or less as a bug in the change itself.