From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: C-d deleting region considered harmful Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:22:51 -0400 Message-ID: <87bp7ux3ec.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87eicrx1ls.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284837865 10186 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2010 19:24:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 19:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 18 21:24:24 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox30x-0003Wr-O0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 21:24:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55528 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ox30o-0000XG-8Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:23:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47420 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ox30e-0000RF-DM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:23:44 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox2zv-0000fH-07 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:22:55 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po40.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.103]:49821) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ox2zt-0000eq-AY; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:22:53 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (173-166-31-145-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.166.31.145]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po40.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o8IJMqBN011390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:22:52 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D92FAC018; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 15:22:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Sat, 18 Sep 2010 10:34:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130444 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > I don't know what was Chong's motivation for it, but one reason is > that the `delete' key is often remapped to C-d. Indeed. I suppose we could get away with mapping C-d to delete-char and [delete] to delete-forward-char. The main disadvantage would be the breaking of the equivalence of C-d and DEL.