From: "Óscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bzr vs. git repository
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2011 13:36:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bp403inf.fsf@telefonica.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20110101.120420.360108937.wl@gnu.org
Werner LEMBERG <wl@gnu.org> writes:
>> Posting this on the Bazaar mailing list would be TRT, IMO. It's
>> always a Good Thing to get the developers think about getting their
>> software more efficient. But posting this here can never make bzr
>> hog less of the bandwidth, so I don't see why would you do this
>> except to tease.
>
> RMS explicitly has asked for that info a few months ago, and only now
> I was able to provide it for various reasons. Since the discussion
> then happened on this very list, I found it appropriate to post it
> here too.
I did quite a few resource usage comparisions back on the days before
the transition to bzr. They were posted on the bzr ml. The response from
the developers was "bzr is fast enough and we wont devote more time to
performance enhancements." However, the data was enough motivation for
one or two developers to tweak some parts of bzr, with visible
results. The impression I got is that further improvements would be very
hard to achieve.
> I suggest to forget the whole issue.
Yes, please.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-01 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-01 8:28 bzr vs. git repository Werner LEMBERG
2011-01-01 9:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-01 9:54 ` Werner LEMBERG
2011-01-01 10:12 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-01 11:04 ` Werner LEMBERG
2011-01-01 12:36 ` Óscar Fuentes [this message]
2011-01-01 10:13 ` Frank Schmitt
2011-01-01 10:14 ` David Kastrup
2011-01-01 11:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-01 11:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-01-01 17:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-01-02 0:33 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bp403inf.fsf@telefonica.net \
--to=ofv@wanadoo.es \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.