From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Antoine Levitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't refer to Emacs as "open source" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:55:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87boxzqh41.fsf@gmail.com> References: <010001cc29eb$fc806cb0$f5814610$@cs.ua.edu> <87zkljcxg4.fsf@gmail.com> <877h8niao3.fsf@gmail.com> <8739jbxpjh.fsf@gmail.com> <81sjrb6vqw.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308154288 28740 80.91.229.12 (15 Jun 2011 16:11:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:11:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 15 18:11:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsgd-0004LE-3K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:11:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42342 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWsgb-0004wV-FY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:11:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49137) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWrVZ-0001QK-HA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:55:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWrVX-0001Fz-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:55:53 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:51012) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QWrVX-0001Fn-K4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:55:51 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QWrVS-0003KK-Pm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:55:46 +0200 Original-Received: from portable63.ceremade.dauphine.fr ([193.48.71.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:55:46 +0200 Original-Received: from antoine.levitt by portable63.ceremade.dauphine.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2011 16:55:46 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 28 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: portable63.ceremade.dauphine.fr Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:140504 Archived-At: 15/06/11 15:59, Jambunathan K > Antoinne > >> I just think that trying to force an agenda on such a survey is >> essentially useless. > > Richard has built the Free Software Movement much by living it and much > more by pure exhortation. Exhortation has it's value though it may not > work against one Antoinne Leavitt. Certainly not on him, I have no idea who this guy is ;) I have nothing against a good exhortation. In fact, I was pleasantly surprised to find an interview of RMS in yesterday's "Le Monde". But we are talking about a survey by an academic researcher which has a completely different focus, and there's not much point in trying to shift it. > >> I just have to cross the street and ignore it > > You cannot even live up to what you are just saying right now. By > writing the mail in first place you have only shown that your words > don't align with your actions == Lack Of Integrity. I agree with you on that, I just love trolling too much. And this thread was so beautiful I couldn't resist. I couldn't even resist answering this post. Shame on my Lack Of Integrity.