From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6693: 24.0.50; font-lock-(builtin|doc) faces are *way* too close Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:24:30 -0400 Message-ID: <87box8vjgx.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <05CB9D294C4646D5A2F574AB5A9DFA55@us.oracle.com> <13C511D445304C4C94EE650D4796ECD0@us.oracle.com> <4E110EB6.3060407@harpegolden.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309885212 20407 80.91.229.12 (5 Jul 2011 17:00:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2011 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6693@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jul 05 19:00:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe8yg-0000xJ-Oh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 19:00:02 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe8yf-0003nE-AI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 13:00:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe7Uq-0001Xo-6V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:25:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe7Uk-0002dh-Vz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:25:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:35796) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe7Uk-0002dd-Mj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe7Uj-0002Hx-Rp; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6693 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6693-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6693.13098794788770 (code B ref 6693); Tue, 05 Jul 2011 15:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6693) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2011 15:24:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe7UM-0002HP-Gi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:24:38 -0400 Original-Received: from vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.143]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qe7UL-0002HB-1O for 6693@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:24:37 -0400 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036225170.central.yale.edu [128.36.225.170]) (authenticated bits=0) by vm-emlprdomr-02.its.yale.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p65FOU2j025577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 5 Jul 2011 11:24:30 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of "Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:24:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.71 on 130.132.50.143 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2011 11:25:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:48035 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > In this specific instance, I think changing the orchid-ish colour to > MediumBlue (or similar) would be a good change, so I've now committed > that. You ended up changing the color definition on 16-color displays, which was probably not your intention. Shortly before, I had already changed the color on high-color displays to dark slate blue, so I went ahead and reverted your change.