From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: OAuth2 implementation in Elisp Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:31:34 +0200 Message-ID: <87boubiujt.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> References: <87sjnojl7j.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316763109 3892 80.91.229.12 (23 Sep 2011 07:31:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 07:31:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 23 09:31:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R70Eb-0006im-80 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:31:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50485 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R70Ea-0006j7-H2 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:31:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33093) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R70EX-0006j2-RP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:31:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R70EW-00012k-TB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:31:41 -0400 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174]:36305 helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R70EW-00012Z-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 03:31:40 -0400 Original-Received: from keller.adm.naquadah.org (AMontsouris-651-1-106-83.w83-202.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.202.161.83]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6ACB35C1C1; Fri, 23 Sep 2011 09:31:38 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:34:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 212.85.154.174 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:144218 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 23 2011, Stefan Monnier wrote: > In trunk? No, at least not now. But in GNU ELPA, very much so, yes. I understand the "no" part, but not "not now". Why not now? Anyway I got my answer, so I'll go publish the thing myself as I usually do. Thanks. :) =2D-=20 Julien Danjou --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJOfDXWAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXC01kQAKq8YNTzQ2jwv/1ec7AJbfiw NFXBmyJF6afQRaGl2gj+/UPI2V2CdEQOqgjVXQuIHrzQnl3ww6Bj9n9QHUc0OOYY aV1llA/VUJgTadaJlfm4ICwGeGSuY/3ZAmbm/6ziMmk/dhhCtIo596sbzH5RaGo5 lDoUESgtd49yxmbkGy5paz270rkp0s/hRKCJCj3Tfa/aqViy3kTTLMO7hoOkuSgP Jv6mkSIgxgzlXWhLJyTbwaFQEwrnj9EahbQ8x8sFte/34QKyCjxuPaSkJ6v5b2HO 87I0FZMGIkio8YPF1RHzB3pHOnor2GmJ/hKzj5TVVs4fUkShvtGClqvuI/zwtVCw hHu5/YGvWDC/mkrCOzculevVkih+OIpeAOkDouMEX34l5FWPTYzMYwCXAimo2HBS 13x1+T3NYyJmZobJxANB1KkMxwHhF0R1c1Csyv/0+y6lKTx8MEtolT7HO2eArMkk Ra3eUSqAuOrq7xNyvhfx7ByVY5YXkKtVoGLN43VimWNKyFevx+aR2N101Bjz76Rq 1Ps6EduPDYMRwyj9/Zc+PKMHHq6on0M6KHPMVreTTKZ6N/UjvdXIOKMVsKAgN00t UHOFrk075qlijyxWAjiMKROQG3wKUqmRJOFPgQ/GzyHHRHf34ry/q9fvp8sLsuIz q6Aqhe5XXavB1H3obCs+ =gUDx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--