From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: Prompts for `C-c .' and `C-c !'
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:50:34 -0500
Message-ID: <87bopujok5.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <8739b65rxo.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:41030)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RpO2S-0004Ft-9k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:50:42 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RpO2R-0005Jm-2x
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:50:40 -0500
Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:52764)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1RpO2Q-0005Jh-P5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2012 12:50:38 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8739b65rxo.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Fran=C3=A7ois?=
	Pinard"'s message of "Mon, 23 Jan 2012 11:01:23 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: =?utf-8?Q?Fran=C3=A7ois?= Pinard <pinard@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

pinard@iro.umontreal.ca (Fran=C3=A7ois Pinard) writes:

> Hi, Org people! :-)
>
> Commands `C-c .' and `C-c !' both insert a time stamp in the buffer, and
> the date is prompted in the mini-buffer in the same way for both
> commands.  One of them is going to insert <DATE>, the other [DATE].  The
> mini-buffer always show <DATE>, like this:
>
>    Date+time [2012-01-23]:   =3D> <2012-01-23 lun>
>
> Could it be:
>
>    Date+time [2012-01-23]:   =3D> [2012-01-23 lun]
>
> when appropriate?  This feedback would be useful (to me at least), in

That's probably not worth the effort.  If you use the wrong one just put
point on the [ or < and hit S-up arrow to switch it.

Regards,
Bernt