From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8657: 24.0.50; Emacs code that seems to use `*-single-char-property-change' incorrectly Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 22:00:21 +0800 Message-ID: <87bopcnjt6.fsf@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328536898 30707 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2012 14:01:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 14:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8657@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 06 15:01:37 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP8Q-0002mT-71 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:01:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43121 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP8P-0006uR-PW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:01:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52871) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP8E-0006kc-RH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:01:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP84-0005AB-BX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP84-0005A7-5B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP8r-0003K9-Uw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:02:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8657 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8657-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8657.132853689912731 (code B ref 8657); Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8657) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2012 14:01:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56528 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP8Q-0003J9-9Y for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:01:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:45203 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP8H-0003Iu-DZ for 8657@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:01:30 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:58601 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RuP7R-0002xd-VH; Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:00:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 12 May 2011 00:44:33 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:56558 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The behavior might have changed at some point in time, explaining the >> above code. > > Or maybe the author was confusing next-single-char-property-change > with next-single-property-change. > > In any case, those tests are redundant, because > next-single-char-property-change already returns point-max when it > finds no change in properties. I went ahead and fixed them accordingly.