From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10868: 24.0.93; `comment-style' needs to be explained Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 11:08:36 +0800 Message-ID: <87boonpq2z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <7AF76478FD534B8B9A07E9FB79060E64@us.oracle.com> <5b4nuizqj9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <3251750A293C4D74AAB64FD8672192CE@us.oracle.com> <87ehtlykdr.fsf@gmx.li> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1330139372 22569 80.91.229.3 (25 Feb 2012 03:09:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10868@debbugs.gnu.org, Lawrence Mitchell To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 25 04:09:31 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1S180p-0004eD-GG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 25 Feb 2012 04:09:31 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33815 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S180o-0005lh-J0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:09:30 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51969) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S180k-0005l2-Qy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:09:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S180j-0005YI-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:09:26 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S180j-0005YE-Lv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:09:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S183G-00045V-Ef for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:12:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:12:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10868 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10868-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10868.133013948515656 (code B ref 10868); Sat, 25 Feb 2012 03:12:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10868) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Feb 2012 03:11:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54836 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S182e-00044S-OG for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:11:24 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52268) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1S182c-00044L-AT for 10868@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:11:23 -0500 Original-Received: from bb116-14-103-36.singnet.com.sg ([116.14.103.36]:55213 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1S1803-0008En-FD; Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:08:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 23 Feb 2012 09:31:16 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:57202 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> OK, here's the problem, and here's a patch. >> 2012-02-23 Lawrence Mitchell >> * lisp/newcomment.el: Autoload comment-styles (Bug#3370). > > Another fix is to remove the ;;;###autoload from comment-style. > If that doesn't introduce other problems, it's a better solution. The docstring of comment-region refers to comment-style, so removing the autoload of comment-style brings us back to square one. I added an autoload for comment-styles.