From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#11265: 24.0.94; gdb-mi very slow on Windows Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 09:56:37 +0800 Message-ID: <87bompn6p6.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83zkaaqo67.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1334714222 14382 80.91.229.3 (18 Apr 2012 01:57:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11265@debbugs.gnu.org To: karl-heinz@schneider-inet.de Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 18 03:57:01 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8g-0000Dl-6T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2012 03:56:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52912 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8f-0006qw-MT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:56:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36412) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8c-0006qB-7V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:56:55 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8a-0006In-Id for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:56:53 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37974) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8a-0006Ig-9q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:56:52 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8k-00065B-CR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:57:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Chong Yidong Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11265 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11265-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11265.133471422023370 (code B ref 11265); Wed, 18 Apr 2012 01:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11265) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Apr 2012 01:57:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39008 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8h-00064s-Qy for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:57:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58478 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8f-00064l-TH for 11265@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:56:58 -0400 Original-Received: from bb116-14-12-6.singnet.com.sg ([116.14.12.6]:60549 helo=ulysses) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SKK8T-0001gT-7w; Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:56:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <83zkaaqo67.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2012 20:10:56 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.95 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:59191 Archived-At: > When this slowdown happens, is the GDB interaction buffer displayed? > If so, does it help to delete the window where the interaction buffer > is shown, so that the buffer is not displayed in any window? > > Another thing to try is start GDB like this: > > M-x gud-gdb RET > > and see if the resulting session is as fast as what you were used to > before 24.0.94. In addition to what Eli suggested, try setting bidi-paragraph-direction to 'left in the *gud* buffer and see if it makes a difference in speed.