From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: LaTeX-version of the emacs-manual Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2012 07:10:14 +0200 Message-ID: <87bogl31e1.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <52c394ee-6e9b-4c9a-a555-689fe3dcf13c@googlegroups.com> <3a57508f-24a5-47c5-9a87-f89500367779@googlegroups.com> <874nmfmhnn.fsf@castleamber.com> <878vbr6ufp.fsf@castleamber.com> <87txufgkrk.fsf@gmail.com> <877graxfxq.fsf@castleamber.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349154634 11020 80.91.229.3 (2 Oct 2012 05:10:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 05:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: John Bokma Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 02 07:10:39 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TIukS-0004rg-B7 for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 07:10:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57731 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIukM-0006uY-FV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:10:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:34109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIukG-0006uB-94 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:10:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIukF-0000Fo-8a for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:45541) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TIukF-0000Eh-1W for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Oct 2012 01:10:11 -0400 Original-Received: by wgbgg4 with SMTP id gg4so2782797wgb.30 for ; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:10:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=yYk4s5lKmO/uFdyveXO+oiQgtYD0xOS7OdW8pgyjThU=; b=YPRpsX7FRjyVXXRKdULuYhCqfaz8SxVa8WQUAXn03nUerXZK0cA5YF+G7TnUxVMpmb kK+x4WeKmQfZZ0tFNUnTyb+c4eSyB7ZzixUuKXBma7mCbztS3X+ZcPTm8BmBjYUElPR9 P5DX4fMrMRFII3pngjrZEsR1EZrBlUTGB/2BEjLqjnbtrzkrnoSO1s9RxQZrOBcrtc5D wbB+u9+7occzKOpV4tEs4S/qemX1AwI5KCuFABekbdcDLBjjoZIpshhX3xeXjjJcE9U6 Ee7Bwd7iPLhpeC4tvmf4+EhQoWwVEVARw5BDWiUpWtNs1FxVa8IBSsitlx73y0gXDjG0 r2wA== Original-Received: by 10.216.201.143 with SMTP id b15mr8421536weo.96.1349154609486; Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:10:09 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain ([81.56.68.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bn7sm364685wib.8.2012.10.01.22.10.07 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 01 Oct 2012 22:10:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4379822EDC; Tue, 2 Oct 2012 07:10:14 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <877graxfxq.fsf@castleamber.com> (John Bokma's message of "Mon, 01 Oct 2012 12:25:37 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:87029 Archived-At: Hi John, John Bokma writes: >> He wrote the following, which should be tried: > > At first he dismissed the issue. Why the fuss? I first asked "Why?" because I could not understand what was making the manual not suitable for printing/reading. The answer was not really replying to this "why", so I asked again, and tried to provide a useful answer afterwards. I acknowledge my sentence "You can't be serious etc..." was perhaps a bit too provocative, I apologize to the OP if it has been perceived as such. Best, -- Bastien