From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: full outline functionality in .el files: how? Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:57:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87boce376k.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <2013-01-21T12-04-57@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <2013-01-23T15-20-19@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87vcanfl1k.fsf@googlemail.com> <20130124113651.GA24543@boo.workgroup> <87ham6oif8.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87vcamitr6.fsf@googlemail.com> <87y5fin16j.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r4lais1a.fsf@googlemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52998) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPGl-0007oN-18 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:03:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPGa-00055r-Ew for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:03:14 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:53331) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TyPGa-00055d-7t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:03:04 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hn14so594444wib.15 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 08:03:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87r4lais1a.fsf@googlemail.com> (Thorsten Jolitz's message of "Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:17:53 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Thorsten Jolitz Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Oh! Now I understand why we miscommunicate... You checked this link... http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#sec-5-4 But the webpage was perhaps not up to date and showed this link instead: http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#sec-5-5 See the first link for my answer to Gregor, which is about using orgstruct-mode folding capacity in emacs-lisp-mode. Also, the difference between Org's cycling and those local cycling features may be related to the fact that the org-cycle functions are not called interactively -- at least in the first FAQ above. Best, -- Bastien