From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] package.el: check tarball signature Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:57:24 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87bo34rqez.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> References: <874n92x9em.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87fvsk9m8b.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <877gdutp1l.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <83pprkc02t.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvsgspq3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <8761tcpnbn.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380967056 10142 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2013 09:57:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 09:57:36 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 05 11:57:39 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VSOcF-0004IC-39 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 11:57:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51334 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSOcE-0000h6-Qs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:57:38 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35924) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSOc7-0000gh-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:57:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSOc2-0007DN-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:57:31 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSOc1-0007D9-Sm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 05:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VSOc0-00044U-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 11:57:24 +0200 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 11:57:24 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 11:57:24 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130008 (Ma Gnus v0.8) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:E7x/a9jmSSQB0DU21cSLNswHrGw= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163870 Archived-At: On Sat, 05 Oct 2013 09:34:52 +0900 Daiki Ueno wrote: DU> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> I can put up my current patch for review but I still have HMAC, maybe >> UMAC, and RSA+DSA+ECC crypto to finish. The hashing methods and the >> ciphers in ECB, CBC, and CTR modes are done with tests. Should I make a >> Bazaar branch for that work? Is anyone interested in reviewing it? DU> Probably I should shut up, but... DU> Does that mean all the package signatures will be signed/verified with DU> your own "Emacs internal" signature format, and all the packagers will DU> need to use your tool and Emacs, instead of GPG, right? No. After I have the basic needs done, I will start on an OpenPGP protocol emulation. DU> That is what I opposed again and again and suggested to use a standard DU> format. Well, OpenPGP is fairly standard, although there are many versions. I'll do my best to be GnuPG-compatible, but my primary goal will be OpenPGP compatibility as in RFC 4880. Ted