From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: electric-indent-mode (was Re: electric-pair-mode) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:39:59 +0100 Message-ID: <87bo1go3pc.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> References: <87fvqsoh6f.fsf@rosalinde.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1384872017 32184 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2013 14:40:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2013 14:40:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 19 15:40:21 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VimTQ-0001cd-CA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:40:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49680 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VimTP-0005fw-Ji for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:40:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54851) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VimTI-0005eQ-9N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:40:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VimTC-0003l0-Gn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:40:08 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:50166) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VimTC-0003fv-75 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 09:40:02 -0500 Original-Received: from rosalinde.fritz.box ([89.245.109.14]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MbrR4-1W0ros1Pj4-00JHCc for ; Tue, 19 Nov 2013 15:40:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:41:17 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MQuFRGXHbp2pzGkDe2PlPpbkSn1Nnpn9o8pEeSk7RES+69iilbw v/3FVU6j0IhkQeQJJHWZn4jLKCbCtPmM579e7J8TWThfIu2qNSEt9YVC1kV403Go0CQ2zAL YwXf05bfX49yXSzELejOyLpwGIcxMaj6SYKuhEbu1mH8VJvie6KpZgGrvmJzfc0t4kXaYyt /kq+Xppt+hb+GHU0hveSg== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4.x-2.6.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:165384 Archived-At: On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 08:41:17 -0500 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> Will there be a new key binding for eval-print-last-sexp in *scratch*? > > There's C-j (if you use a recent enough version from trunk). Indeed, my build was 20 revisions too old; sorry for the noise. Steve Berman