From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: How close does Emacs already come to Soulver? Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:57:12 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnywxo0n.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87txcoy5or.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390913859 680 80.91.229.3 (28 Jan 2014 12:57:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:57:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs To: Tim Visher Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 28 13:57:46 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W88Ea-0004f0-JV for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:57:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37012 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W88Ea-0000Ai-9Z for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:57:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38965) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W88EG-0008PZ-Uq for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W88E8-0004Ff-4Z for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:57:24 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b]:50217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W88E7-0004FM-Qw for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:57:16 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id c11so293765lbj.30 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:57:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; bh=MslY/rGnCFpedPkKDD0Nd8A+U7inQzjVbE+8zuD15hQ=; b=iMZnUJiLcu36LMiEMeCy4MDyRZL2sT1gVhgL7ROEUNfiDU+JX0FzdpmYE32XYt1ltK 26n7uct7eVeFcHrN2Sh0tenkfDUO3LBVf41/9a8CRckPJJCrrBJK27sk6Hgc3nFC2M/I 9DZJ5mM0Vk2314pO8A3xnpIEyON78TRjowb0POYYtb0vyQGq49SeLaj0sgZoxPzJWFUO bODnr4/TOO4iEmZ//t1bCSJrmF7kjKRGYig9Wjhx1Ty7H1xR9KyFnn01wYQ4zFsGHBQs 3Zh+twQlQmN99AkUabG+cdczEeLgcowpgSYRrxQBmxJCHTnETXj5jQUsoGLLjQtE5fy4 thaA== X-Received: by 10.112.131.100 with SMTP id ol4mr885699lbb.38.1390913834705; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:57:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.localdomain (AMontsouris-651-1-148-18.w83-202.abo.wanadoo.fr. [83.202.7.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wt2sm16451691lbb.2.2014.01.28.04.57.13 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 28 Jan 2014 04:57:13 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 152611C20654; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:57:12 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Tim Visher's message of "Tue, 28 Jan 2014 07:21:51 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:95726 Archived-At: Tim Visher writes: > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:35 AM, Bastien wrote: >> Tim Visher writes: >> >>> It strikes me as something that calc or org might already do. >>> >>> Thoughts? >> >> Yes, Emacs and Org could do this. You would need to let a table's >> formulas be recalculated at each insertion (see post-command-hook). >> >> That said, those demos are shiny when watching for a few seconds, >> but we you really edit a buffer, you don't really want text that >> is *not* under point to change at each insertion. This is tiring. >> At least this is how I feel it. > > I'd actually be quite satisfied with having to call something to have > the results recalculated, how would I go about getting the actual > calculations done though? You mean C-c C-c on the #+TBLFM line ? -- Bastien