From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dumper problems and a possible solutions Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:16:58 +0900 Message-ID: <87bntgy16t.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <20140624171955.GS179@brightrain.aerifal.cx> <53AB0EF8.4090608@yandex.ru> <20140625180823.GV179@brightrain.aerifal.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1403741846 6042 80.91.229.3 (26 Jun 2014 00:17:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:17:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Dmitry Antipov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rich Felker Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 26 02:17:19 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WzxNO-00084R-VM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 02:17:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41652 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzxNO-000859-Ax for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:17:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44709) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzxNF-00084A-A4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:17:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzxN7-000512-NY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:17:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:46591) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WzxN7-00050t-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Jun 2014 20:17:01 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mgmt1.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E988A3FA0B26; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:16:58 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DD75511F082; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 09:16:58 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <20140625180823.GV179@brightrain.aerifal.cx> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" acf1c26e3019 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.223 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:172738 Archived-At: Rich Felker writes: > Can you or anyone else provide some answers to this question? Sure. src/dumper.c and the memory description objects in the XEmacs sources. If it's not tracked there (such as buffers and internal file objects), then it's an implementation restriction but we havent't needed it in practice, so a good first cut for you is to leave it out. If it is handled there, then you can think about whether you need to worry about it in your scheme or not.