From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch queue management systems Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 06:52:36 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87bnna5rp7.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <546D2E75.6090701@cs.ucla.edu> <837fyp7tvi.fsf@gnu.org> <546E2899.4050702@cs.ucla.edu> <54756754.5090103@cs.ucla.edu> <54762721.4060908@cs.ucla.edu> <17zjb2h650.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <86mw71pl6d.fsf@yandex.ru> <83fvct145r.fsf@gnu.org> <5486F304.9030101@yandex.ru> <83iohkwy0p.fsf@gnu.org> <54872EA6.9090405@yandex.ru> <83egs8wwr6.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3w7a7sr.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1418299550 4083 80.91.229.3 (11 Dec 2014 12:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:05:50 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 13:05:43 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz2V5-0006jm-Gs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:05:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50463 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz2V4-0001LP-OM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:05:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41051) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz2Uh-0001KH-On for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:05:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz2Ub-0002Ta-B2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:05:19 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59165) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz2Ub-0002TM-40 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 07:05:13 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xz2US-0006Op-K5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:05:04 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:05:04 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 11 Dec 2014 13:05:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LgX2Ap7KvNMV7+5fXh92OstjkNo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:179741 Archived-At: On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 09:59:28 +0100 Steinar Bang wrote: >>>>>> Ted Zlatanov : >> It could be more fine-grained, only protecting certain branches >> (master, emacs-*, etc.). Then people can push to "username/feature" >> branches and maintainers can merge into a protected branch. SB> "username/feature" sounds like a good naming scheme and one that could SB> cut down on the inevitable clutter (implicit blame). SB> (and I still think having a separate feature branch git repository is a SB> good idea. Yeah, it would make allowing non-fast-forward pushes easier. SB> If that repository resides on the same server and is created with SB> hardlinks to the real repo, it should also be cheap disk-usage-wise, SB> at least initially....) Eh. Ted