From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Oleh Krehel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Use of dedicated windows in gdb-mi.el Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:48:13 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnl2c1du.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87h9uynckc.fsf@gmail.com> <83iofedfkz.fsf@gnu.org> <877fvun97j.fsf@gmail.com> <83fvaid8sa.fsf@gnu.org> <83fvaf9jj2.fsf@gnu.org> <878ug7axhr.fsf@gmail.com> <837fvr9frq.fsf@gnu.org> <87sief9ezy.fsf@gmail.com> <831tlz9deh.fsf@gnu.org> <8761bb9cq8.fsf@gmail.com> <048211e0-0bf4-4c69-8908-aae20a2e58fb@default> <877fvraq0n.fsf@gmail.com> <83wq3q9amp.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1423511542 14453 80.91.229.3 (9 Feb 2015 19:52:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2015 19:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: drew.adams@oracle.com, thibaut.verron@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 09 20:52:21 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YKuNW-0001rX-ON for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:52:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34905 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKuNW-0002pt-C0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:52:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52455) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKuNS-0002nV-5R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKuNN-000670-50 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:52:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]:51670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YKuNM-00066u-UF; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 14:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r20so3710535wiv.2; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:52:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=T7L9hOUVEsU7H8FnKdSBhzXzfyA94lkdIPM9VwzLt0M=; b=JF5yNs4NWStbKpEQwe7gXTNc82ZV9bBCin21ZhGvBiYqQXu3I/1KoEnns83z16nuXe L2GzC1pQWbahsNBRhgEsme/6bcCntqWXq1Uouuf4IxzFeKk2zwUMTLEjagLb3L9Rdjuj 2XgWaAeZrbaMoQhc9j/iGOfrljo1hjt54CJ2lK7zrzQDRQIn65/8ICrb9nPOvhyCRPei Ah4yREM1QaIxD06T2IwAcGrIw4OzMWnnnF+lKjznhwWSw5AUQIOxI3jEMcbbfnmW0Qjd sGdEdlakANCIZQZOmmFmI3xWIubj3CwtKOfznsiz5p/8f7EPXgVqQEFRTP8y/R71vb1k Wx6A== X-Received: by 10.180.198.240 with SMTP id jf16mr38032016wic.27.1423511527712; Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:52:07 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from firefly (dyn069045.nbw.tue.nl. [131.155.69.45]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm15745411wix.12.2015.02.09.11.52.07 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 09 Feb 2015 11:52:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83wq3q9amp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 09 Feb 2015 20:56:46 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:182731 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Oleh Krehel >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , thibaut.verron@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 19:39:04 +0100 >> >> To top it off, it looks exactly the same all the other windows, 99.5% of >> which that don't behave this way. > > So maybe we should have some clear indication of the fact that a > window is dedicated. Would you like to work on that? No, thanks. (defadvice set-window-dedicated-p (around no-dedicated-windows activate)) Problem solved:)