From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: conflicting uses of next-error-function Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 10:26:17 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87bnhz9k3a.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <83zja6b3tc.fsf@gnu.org> <83fv7kwbow.fsf@gnu.org> <55411797.2090704@yandex.ru> <554165C5.2090301@yandex.ru> <5541E20F.9000602@yandex.ru> <55455BD0.50508@yandex.ru> <55460A64.4060407@yandex.ru> <55462CDA.5040300@yandex.ru> <877fso6l2r.fsf@lifelogs.com> <55482AD4.2090403@yandex.ru> <87383bbbkr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <5548CE37.2050806@yandex.ru> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1430836274 29843 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2015 14:31:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 14:31:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 05 16:31:02 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypds6-0001ei-Jp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 16:30:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39715 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypds1-0000gV-2x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:30:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41929) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpdrU-0000e6-QV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:30:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpdrM-0003W0-5e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:30:16 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:40269) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpdrL-0003Tk-OV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 10:30:08 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YpdrJ-0001Az-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 16:30:05 +0200 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 16:30:05 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 May 2015 16:30:05 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:E/Ltt9nKLxzuXWpwIgFIlPZX9/U= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186234 Archived-At: On Tue, 5 May 2015 17:05:43 +0300 Dmitry Gutov wrote: DG> On 05/05/2015 12:47 PM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> So far, we only know of those two cases, yes. But we can adjust the >> priority further by the buffer's stack position as I suggested above, or >> by user-supplied criteria. We could make it a floating-point value but >> I'm not sure that would be a usability gain :) DG> My instinct is to have a boolean var, and in case any new cases turn DG> up, add a few new possible symbol values. For all we know, non-0, DG> non-100 situations might not be easily described with a number. Sound good to me :) Ted