From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: etags test is broken on MS-Windows Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87bnhbrv2r.fsf@igel.home> References: <83y4kmdjmj.fsf@gnu.org> <837fs04egz.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalco1mg.fsf@igel.home> <83y4kg2yjc.fsf@gnu.org> <83wq002yct.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6oo0h3.fsf@igel.home> <83vbfk2x9l.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnhcnym6.fsf@igel.home> <83pp5r3iij.fsf@gnu.org> <838ucf3dh8.fsf@gnu.org> <834mn339p2.fsf@gnu.org> <831ti7389n.fsf@gnu.org> <87oalbsgwl.fsf@igel.home> <83wpzz1qf8.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2vzsde4.fsf@igel.home> <83vbfj1k5c.fsf@gnu.org> <87fv6nrypc.fsf@igel.home> <83k2vz19fw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1432406784 21074 80.91.229.3 (23 May 2015 18:46:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 18:46:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 23 20:46:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YwER8-0007Pl-Uo for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38434 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwER8-00039g-7d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:46:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwER5-00039b-1O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:46:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwER4-0004PX-3b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:46:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1]:35448) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YwER0-0004P5-70; Sat, 23 May 2015 14:46:10 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lvDD05VJfz3hhf6; Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:08 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3lvDD01zrfzvh20; Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8-abfzBWsEyQ; Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: 15HQVBlmv1sL/+KQwzxKOI69JRwW61IEDzUdmwxCuJZY8kwOqD1VtzbgwyjIZC17 Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-93-104-184-121.dynamic.mnet-online.de [93.104.184.121]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:04 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 18D7E2C4211; Sat, 23 May 2015 20:46:04 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: An air of FRENCH FRIES permeates my nostrils!! In-Reply-To: <83k2vz19fw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 23 May 2015 20:37:55 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 2001:a60:0:28:0:1:25:1 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:186774 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: pot@gnu.org, eggert@cs.ucla.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 23 May 2015 19:27:43 +0200 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > So etags is only required to produce approximately correct byte >> > positions, and it does that well enough. >> >> If you want approximate positions then a line-column pair would be ^^^^^^^^^^^ >> better. > > How do you define a column count? It doesn't matter. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."