From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Matthias Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21934: 24.5; find-tag: reading TAGS file incorrectly Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:50:40 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnakr76n.fsf@winky.hogwarts> References: <87ziyd20cb.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <564AA697.9000203@yandex.ru> <83egfj4i2b.fsf@gnu.org> <56511795.2050207@yandex.ru> <83si3y2et4.fsf@gnu.org> <5651F350.6080203@yandex.ru> <83h9ke2av1.fsf@gnu.org> <5651FED4.8080508@yandex.ru> <877fl9sz4j.fsf@winky.hogwarts> <83bnal3nsq.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1448297486 905 80.91.229.3 (23 Nov 2015 16:51:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21934@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 23 17:51:14 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uKd-0004lx-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:51:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33420 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uKe-0002iR-Aq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:51:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33949) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uKY-0002da-5M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:51:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uKU-00032i-1w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:51:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uKT-00032e-UB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:51:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uKT-000587-Na for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:51:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andreas Matthias Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21934 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21934-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21934.144829744219690 (code B ref 21934); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 16:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21934) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2015 16:50:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49737 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uK9-00057V-0d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:50:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:36968) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1a0uK6-00057N-Pv for 21934@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:50:39 -0500 Original-Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so112967694wmw.0 for <21934@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:50:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=eDrRPmupF0qHw7qny05h5K83yYBhylepPhOkluNnqBw=; b=fgfUmklWIHFL+KMBSLv0gao+CkuEzkvfwXA2OBtZoLDj4s9B5/OzcJUhwrYS0vunQZ JhcccZrMz9wG6yuSMHYEN8TQqklgavWazXm6PaJNnDwflDpIXy9ttF67htTA68vgfeUR R/4V/7NkGLKQcr6hpcSye/7gQq7lHq48rkT2ioGd2zVP4rlTKP+72hzxIn0zs8qjHBim 7KRlhK7hmyZkOtUIwYH/3yo1iLUBQc+HNigQUO7oAsPYVumPYd8bFdFBvPZgG0GH5joM q0cFQqQtZL0FXH7PPPLRWTzpuhAic+NonoLZY1UvVM/7tVnKsZS6xCWRp6NkkuZaoVR4 Bb7w== X-Received: by 10.28.23.136 with SMTP id 130mr18735562wmx.94.1448297437914; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:50:37 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from winky.hogwarts (HSI-KBW-109-193-111-125.hsi7.kabel-badenwuerttemberg.de. [109.193.111.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bh6sm3112449wjb.0.2015.11.23.08.50.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 23 Nov 2015 08:50:36 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by winky.hogwarts (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 056A316E061E; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 17:50:40 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83bnal3nsq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 22 Nov 2015 20:13:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:109127 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Matthias >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , 21934@debbugs.gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2015 18:49:32 +0100 >> >> >> Can there be >> >> more than one of these in a token, and if so, what should etags do? >> >> IOW, if we have foo.bar.baz or foo:bar.baz etc., what should be the >> >> result? >> > >> > Just two, I think. foo.bar is not a function, and bar.baz probably won't be a >> > "symbol at point". >> > >> > So just the fully qualified tag name, and the local tag name ("baz"). >> >> Yes, that's reasonable. > > I'm sorry: can I have a complete specification, please? Given a > token that includes one or more of '.' and ':', how to determine the 2 > tags that etags should produce? See `funcname' in: http://www.lua.org/manual/5.3/manual.html#9