From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: First draft of the Emacs website Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:07:52 +0100 Message-ID: <87bna8sujr.fsf@petton.fr> References: <565EE871.6030805@gmail.com> <87d1uproci.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878u5cswx2.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h9k0svqq.fsf@petton.fr> <871tb4sv6w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449072492 21649 80.91.229.3 (2 Dec 2015 16:08:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:08:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Random832 , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 17:08:03 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a49wo-0004dp-GK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 17:08:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59031 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a49wn-0005T9-Ng for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:08:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35894) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a49wj-0005RV-Np for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:07:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a49wh-0002SG-0W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:07:57 -0500 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:55908) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a49wg-0002S8-Tp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:07:54 -0500 Original-Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72ABD204F6 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:07:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:07:54 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=N2TjHGwhTs3XnsNcDK6Oo7Isj54=; b=SwLt/ uS/2pMkKPevt56sLfLFXXV7JDEuUEJYAmq0YztZaoGzaB7ccT/Yuf0hWSby13xD8 HWMg76U/aFuawksmXa/Vbxq76U3zHUo1tfi+QZnr98pgC1NQj18YxiAuH7SxOPel /7ivyIEtKo5x9GmEMiEioi7HdMoghFshx0PUA8= X-Sasl-enc: nW/BjJ0lGRrN8GNYUhsOxh0EtqkV6Zm/CZbtnpULmNmH 1449072474 Original-Received: from blueberry (89-156-196-194.rev.numericable.fr [89.156.196.194]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BC778C013FE; Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:07:53 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <871tb4sv6w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 66.111.4.28 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195758 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain David Kastrup writes: > There is a reason ad blockers are widely used in order to > systematically deal with some of the worst misconceptions of page > authors about their users' needs. Is my Emacs website so wrong because I added transitions to anchors? I really wonder why Firefox has JS support at all. Ads on the web (as well as tracking) are a huge annoyance, but it's totally unrelated to my animations (which degrades to regular anchors BTW on browsers with no JS support). Have you turned on `trolling-mode' today? I'm sorry but I won't participate in this discussion anymore. Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWXxdYAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQXMAIAIL/V3qtR76Jct6l5GoJ/KU4 S2qDWZbbTO1eO7zR/cVmnhVv6h2nAKV9Kvm6QhOvWI+3COCUmhNNukfyrbjrY2Mu IF6/byU5X1EKPaKb/n8tTcziz09tnLjm6eQMN5ehpSbgQYwOtmbzpEKb50N9rscC HjzVIvgShFjZN7q6HtDjSLXElvjoaRzrQaynI7LDLi8dD+dmh2OVo5rcRah63CWV /LrVWZx6+QBP/YMw9lmyohSinA923YGUb0D9phhGZzRaAUhtUiHVblCzlQqbhQXN /FUD6N294QYEFzOposWx/Y1QnfoOqnTMmsIlE/kew4KZmExd5954CcmEoW9eawQ= =sq4R -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--