From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rasmus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Character folding in the pretest Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:52:23 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn7u3ss8.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87mvriuk3a.fsf@gmail.com> <8737t9ex1p.fsf@petton.fr> <83oabxyf71.fsf@gnu.org> <56B230D1.90902@gmail.com> <87bn7x4i4o.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87d1sc4rin.fsf@djcbsoftware.nl> <837fiit92x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454763175 17748 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2016 12:52:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:52:55 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 13:52:43 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Lz-0005Kx-1D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:52:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53358 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Ly-0006P0-CH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 07:52:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49950) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Lv-0006On-9S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 07:52:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Lq-0007T3-BD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 07:52:39 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:60729) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Lq-0007Si-4f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 07:52:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aS2Ll-00054U-Rh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:52:29 +0100 Original-Received: from x4db1025c.dyn.telefonica.de ([77.177.2.92]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:52:29 +0100 Original-Received: from rasmus by x4db1025c.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 13:52:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 19 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x4db1025c.dyn.telefonica.de Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAAmJLR0QA/4ePzL8AAAAJcEhZ cwAAAEgAAABIAEbJaz4AAAHPSURBVEjHjZbJlQMxCAU7AKKsuCo3UpkDaOnNPX2wn22VPqAP8hH/ flDh+FgUAUSAmqn+BgBVVDO/ACIQ1FDT1C8FQCiZVAU/cyBCKigiPpOu6sD6dDzvewb2D8fTMk4E yfrB43nfDcF0g08hAaP0a9cw3YI61v59pIyKTGAUCJgATVAmqN9mTPWFmjmThiDGOdFiG2GbKadC CVBFH8HVRrQrdACsR6VcJC0MZmZmmmaXtQUcGh3VeBtONfOq4J4GVLb09gvoBETXKzjg3J6R9La/ ZWTKpESFpDegDc9Yv86jiBMQM+YuYEcz7TSJCTijGc3FNIR5B9p0Q0DQPuN5CneABYjEUHyo0shi CTAzxlegQqJz3tz6CMSmsNwNgfITyL0d0Ew2lfPUmMe19Vtm+bZrdQWmvzfZ8lod3nWQ4d7wc5gs Q3FXYDmlR2X1kGbeZ+tsnJFK93+f9MMwno3qqdCt4MP0rkWnL2YyGnkHyndjYKyCmQB3YJbQ66mD j0BEQJrpYgpM8Q3oqWXuxlPe7ri+1NLcjeqrQqzG2BSquC933Bo2aypVmG+XoosY66t4b0CbYwup Z+z7tTvH60kgv/5r9HqJDu7rn0ARgt1zfwjk8VmXGaNCAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:n/k4FASJhWbERdq7tXMVOh/IN3I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199409 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > No one intends to continue "ad infinitum". That's another red > herring. We should continue collecting feedback for a couple > more of pretest releases, that's all. Then we can make the > decision based on that feedback. I counted 10 people (excluding > myself and Artur) who expressed their clear opinions in this > thread; that is way too few for an intelligent decision, IMO. My language probably does not fit the agnostic approach. Nonetheless, this is an awesome features and I think it should be on by default. Thanks for working on this to all those who have done so! Rasmus -- C is for Cookie