From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Asynchronous DNS Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn7m9pxd.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <83y4b0wi7m.fsf@gnu.org> <87si17evk6.fsf@gnus.org> <83twlnvcz2.fsf@gnu.org> <87vb63obm3.fsf@gnus.org> <87r3gqmg6g.fsf@gnus.org> <83egcqtfnm.fsf@gnu.org> <86mvrdmk8p.fsf@realize.ch> <877fihjo4m.fsf@gnus.org> <86io20n3xn.fsf@realize.ch> <8760y055l1.fsf@gnus.org> <8660xzmyyr.fsf@realize.ch> <87pow7ocyw.fsf@gnus.org> <861t8nmxlj.fsf@realize.ch> <87y4auiurw.fsf@gnus.org> <86k2me8dee.fsf@realize.ch> <83a8n9ddk5.fsf@gnu.org> <864mdh8vj5.fsf@realize.ch> <87pow579kt.fsf@gnus.org> <86ziv87st0.fsf@realize.ch> <87vb5u4qtq.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455273374 29241 80.91.229.3 (12 Feb 2016 10:36:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:36:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 12 11:36:07 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUB53-0002VK-Cb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:36:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUB52-0001PS-0z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:36:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47003) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUB4v-0001Ow-3T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:36:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUB4q-0002iP-FP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:35:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:56290) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUB4q-0002fo-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 05:35:52 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3q1rnw5tZhz3hjNG for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:35:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.68]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3q1rnw58Bvzvh1s for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:35:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.68]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PV5aUnUfiyRf for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:35:42 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 8Svj4Q4TJQ/GICXJBFTvXznBsy7n7Woy0El6oe8QZmNAD9vduI/ZTC7t5uwCcIBF Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-6-173.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.6.173]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:35:42 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 73C032C254B; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 11:35:42 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I put aside my copy of ``BOWLING WORLD'' and think about GUN CONTROL legislation.. In-Reply-To: <87vb5u4qtq.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 12 Feb 2016 13:15:13 +1100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:199806 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > We could fix that, of course -- there's really no reason for that > function to be checking infd/outfd, I think? None of the other set-process-* functions have that check so it surely looks wrong. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."