From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Heerdegen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.help Subject: Re: Making sure I'm not checking email (or doing other things) too often Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:08:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87bn7iypsk.fsf@web.de> References: <87d1rz2ebl.fsf@mbork.pl> <87h9hayr31.fsf@web.de> <87si0u10ms.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455548954 9991 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2016 15:09:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: Marcin Borkowski Original-X-From: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 15 16:09:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aVKlq-0008Ao-FU for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:09:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33088 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVKlp-0000Ba-Rk for geh-help-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:09:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49211) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVKlX-00008V-E6 for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:08:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVKlT-0008WD-Df for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:08:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:50665) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aVKlT-0008W7-4J for help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:08:39 -0500 Original-Received: from drachen.dragon ([92.74.178.250]) by smtp.web.de (mrweb004) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MH2Fm-1aj4Gs3pZ4-00DoeQ; Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:08:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87si0u10ms.fsf@mbork.pl> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:58:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.91 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MNiOJebPE+zes4EY4VZtx8Kz8R+VF3zsyGB9KFiIqhWTFjzWLjw J+U5vZTtWMQbjz79Q+5MG5rZrop1QlgU1PLZnvJ8RMG0IIaiY7FM0Wc80im7qasSlcSBxHZ H2YrnXnacvkjceLe9ljFVWnuSUfy8oLp0TKcMdSzHWkHpwhyAH2q+TacoJ/OFxQZ97y8kLx Kz6VbkVVr5ck9MbkFev5A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:p8d2d/tpV4Q=:6PIsaZLOBWR2NT+mws7DnZ YJpeYzOejU+uo/k6AY4j1Zp95l3aYLypMg2MJMlaqth1uov3hBJ0AlEg0A7WZFj5GmXEuN0rm 8EIwpbxTjdj6PxcYMLlNUZv+6hv6TNJofjPWNSbNwo1THMDC5gzMBzt8TEtEkiYK2dTVebx+a ZUUXAJPRJcYhVjeNcjNusjBSdxqhgEnmTAlj/tFUv5jasT8G5nYR6ruf8drAJOsosnYHKwxcx q8bmpF2PV+h7Gz79ti4sOGzVLmHGsK0RGaI4fa28iLK4PhsGY0HeuovHRygaPOrQ6MS3jdmcQ HZJTkfrXvJuSxCf3akOXyO/vZF+5u3wG/wdWAOEmINcWP3FAWHBmvT+OYa5bube93nVSPj2I6 /jHmiwSLP8wc5owL0w7TUx7XM+wvsZPaN4qcjWxj11dwPkQNnKbTko61lWfxIAmLu66qvRHHq aL2Fkwynau4t3d3IESuN+CrSugzEbbzhT+BWKYANVviHuQkd6spcW4+BH3JVrev4Fmf0U0Mnd fGqn1rZEKhKONYlUeqD5/q+DDtWP22CVGpRwbb9zGFbZCyHQE0F/eaabd/GDKWECEH/k7lHoj RmoszESy+nhfU31bAWHvrQqfXIFWj5PjA+nUMNmHbD4zH3bMeg6ojN2WoN21XTKp03AHzBRXA 3rYnUYFQHtUPMZkx/hMg1ehp1VUDHcWvCTwkCPDjLX0pBspRU56qLjHNEu5Rq29cbWVtydJ1g 9bU/vo+rp+vA8t1V+aN3MU9qRUbptB8UnLy5lUSg7CP5MfYQuugwP9prNLlrOatR/fVlNPp5 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.4 X-BeenThere: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: help-gnu-emacs-bounces+geh-help-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.help:109180 Archived-At: Marcin Borkowski writes: > > [ An alternative approach would be to make `not-too-often-add-guard' a > > macro. This would avoid the need of using `symbol-value' which some > > find not aesthetic, but that's more a matter of personal taste, and you > > surely know that already. ] > > I did not even consider it, because what I want to do is to feed > `not-too-often-add-guard' to mapc. The assumption is that the user will > have an alist of command/time interval pairs. You would just use `dolist' or a lambda wrapper around the macro call (with the current signature, you can't `mapc' your function over an alist directly anyway). > Thanks, I'll probably make use of it, if you have nothing against (I > plan to eventually put this on Melpa). I don't care. Regards, Michael.