From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#14206: 24.3.50; doc string of `execute-kbd-macro' Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:10:44 +0200 Message-ID: <87bn4s1jln.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87vbwpstlo.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87vbwpkqba.fsf@building.gnus.org> <87k2jh1fea.fsf@gnus.org> <83shy4x5ro.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvoca7u0.fsf@gnus.org> <874mak76lf.fsf@linux-m68k.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1461946312 18211 80.91.229.3 (29 Apr 2016 16:11:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: kevin.d.rodgers@gmail.com, 14206@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Apr 29 18:11:40 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1awB11-0006Xj-QB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:11:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55349 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0u-0000tN-R3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0f-0000a1-Fr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:11:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0T-0008Oj-Hl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:11:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:43223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0T-0008NY-Dw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0Q-0002fC-1B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 14206 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 14206-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B14206.146194625910230 (code B ref 14206); Fri, 29 Apr 2016 16:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 14206) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2016 16:10:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55559 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0K-0002er-8N for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:46372) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awB0F-0002eg-7O for 14206@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 12:10:54 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1awB08-0007jd-E6; Fri, 29 Apr 2016 18:10:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <874mak76lf.fsf@linux-m68k.org> (Andreas Schwab's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:55:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:117204 Archived-At: Andreas Schwab writes: > Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > >> Perhaps something like >> >> If MACRO is a symbol, and its function definition is a string or a >> vector of keyboard events, its function definition is used. > > But the function definition is used unconditionally. True. So perhaps just a usage note? "This is useful for keyboard macros stored as function definitions" or something? Because as it is now, the natural interpretation is that it's generally useful for functions. And it isn't. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no