Re: Should there be a k&r2 c-style?

[Alex <agrambot@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 421 bytes --]

John Wiegley <jwiegley@gmail.com> writes:

>>>>>> "A" == Alex  <agrambot@gmail.com> writes:
>
> A> Is something like this okay?
>
> Yes, that looks good to me.  You may want to mention "stroustrup" in quotes
> when naming the style, so that people know exactly what to look for.

That makes sense. I surrounded it in a @code block to match some other
mentions of styles.

If it's acceptable, would you commit it for me?


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: style --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 513 bytes --]

diff --git a/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi b/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi
index f311ec8..6916169 100644
--- a/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi
+++ b/doc/misc/cc-mode.texi
@@ -2554,7 +2554,9 @@ for C code in GNU programs.
 
 @item k&r
 @cindex K&R style
-The classic Kernighan and Ritchie style for C code.
+The classic Kernighan and Ritchie style for C code. If you're looking
+for the style used in the 2nd edition of their book ``The C
+Programming Language'', then check out the @code{stroustrup} style.
 
 @item bsd
 @cindex BSD style

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 5 bytes --]


TIA