From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25556: 26.0.50.1; Requiring uncompiled eieio issues obsoletion warnings Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:20:27 -0500 Message-ID: <87bmupsur8.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> References: <878tpw1bml.fsf@engster.org> <83wpdfzmcg.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziibzigh.fsf@engster.org> <87o9yrs1bq.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <87h94izy1j.fsf@engster.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485706824 31886 195.159.176.226 (29 Jan 2017 16:20:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:20:24 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) To: 25556@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 17:20:20 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsD0-0006iN-HH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 17:20:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55846 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsD5-0005Ix-Vm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:20:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34626) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsD0-0005Hd-8d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:20:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsCx-0003Fe-5w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:20:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:52160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsCx-0003FX-2F for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:20:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsCw-000690-PU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:20:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25556 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25556-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25556.148570676723572 (code B ref 25556); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25556) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2017 16:19:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50359 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsCM-000688-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:19:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-it0-f52.google.com ([209.85.214.52]:34190) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXsCL-00067v-91 for 25556@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:19:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-it0-f52.google.com with SMTP id k200so17632763itb.1 for <25556@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 08:19:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=edgSImGeIotcu2Ho0cpRHx/VjKIMQgYB5qcmoDRZQ+A=; b=uGHGI9r3f3bSCEor/hzFwKfFDuZ3Upj0WKXWTIH/Y9CWQC6yu+A/pRV0mBGbbkINRh QDDggGa0FXqKTTDKiGoq3uyack9eunjFUYOm574JLcf9G69+FD88cywoI+FsJ+qdWZIG GtUIFgYOvEkPANHM6NwdVoscLFELIKVJZHCqVf/XUxEWYP7JcZz6KuQf3l0JfZpzc6vX p+UWlvDENfKiGugq/CW4NWdKAEa+5+/Soi4liss7LDAg6vsmOXN/eRy+9jOxd0GZMCbB J6cdXdiff16TJQBUugNcBFLoydp4SCwPfhkO+D86XZq89A2QPQf8BcBiiRkHKzS2341f C8Lg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=edgSImGeIotcu2Ho0cpRHx/VjKIMQgYB5qcmoDRZQ+A=; b=BGCWmhxaySDAQ41f9PpsiiB2w/5LVux+HoDQAde9inzWaobeYo/oeP1ZL0lto05BSz uX3sZMe7HLLPjVz0MIAcMS/iAkwAS6k/Rkrfl6FMtv7OoV0PHEWl3ICrniV3VzBke7SF QHLexULmAw3eNe/D9LStVzkmvKIJLiCW+sLveZuwJ01OWokLsxfOV3UNHOrftJ6SJIR1 jFbi2ND3/ECxliBqaeUa9y9zCBzPqGZqHTzNakEpHvlXXOwW9wgG/dSrv+2SnpHQUcuS MNleaxxOBcLdMpTi+Ehoo1szwBHjx7troc/YIf45no5cj1Pc3vxiMOWvZkyIheinshbm cBkw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJLeBcJ6bvY56XaG4byzYJqaGADgYPmZP2lIJQuRad1t7B076nEK31j8LXsG5CHcg== X-Received: by 10.36.84.148 with SMTP id t142mr12536222ita.90.1485706759819; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 08:19:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from zony ([45.2.7.65]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id j74sm6799760iod.44.2017.01.29.08.19.18 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 08:19:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87h94izy1j.fsf@engster.org> (David Engster's message of "Sat, 28 Jan 2017 22:15:20 +0100") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128758 Archived-At: David Engster writes: >> >> I'm not sure about `eieio-object-name-string', but the message about >> `destructor' is because cl-defgeneric makes the declaration handling >> code run before the function defining code, so the symbol is declared >> obsolete before it's defined and the definition itself triggers the >> obsolete warning. The patch below moves it around and stops the >> `destructor' warning: > > Thanks for looking into to it, your patch works fine for me. Can this be > applied? I pushed to master [1: 9bf9463]. 1: 2017-01-29 11:16:06 -0500 9bf94639b8f674d2c7894df35f26f09d0ecc67f5 Don't warn about obsolete defgenerics when defining them