From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master adfb6f1: Continue to fix bug#25607 Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:48:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmt238as.fsf@detlef> References: <20170215184246.30452.62655@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20170215184247.DC51023357@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <874lyult4z.fsf@detlef> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1489589380 4584 195.159.176.226 (15 Mar 2017 14:49:40 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2017 14:49:40 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 15 15:49:36 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1coAF5-0000et-E4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:49:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37861 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coAFB-0002zp-HS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:49:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46419) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coAEC-0002yE-Vd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coAE9-0004qY-1z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:48:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.18]:63152) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1coAE8-0004qF-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:48:36 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.56.33]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MSv6D-1cg9U00bqv-00RqaV; Wed, 15 Mar 2017 15:48:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 15 Mar 2017 10:41:36 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8TvCwP2PISpWjaW6AheHkOhtQNmM/+KuE17V0BlElDbpSQb+oD7 dUEkNz7io+sbUsYlRDHEv715l19sPRPbHY3nx7CC2phjKfFbInXSRTJR4HaCPiIe7JdzmRX 533TQFWZDX6Dpn0oyWkFdVSgqVY1I8hTYu+vehzfWAODwPMSLWzrDsqwCt3q+/CXoolLgve pbTGb0BDnvMDWw/pzhrCg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:uZGvmbUdyqc=:2XDNxQiqQ12b65E9GB1VYm bo/IumcIcXgg2SuVTw58xq6grpXkol7t7eWY+kldQj3rBVGiU8asH8EwC5j0Q38iDO3PQMKOZ QOpY2SRyJSFiy+SZ9Zp5fkBX2jeyeRFj/n/E1IsTL5IeckxLuUhTpaqllpstrkMR4td3NFx6e C1IOwHhYcEBEiXEefEVba/8s02rdoDQUZ7IkP/MT1/wy/ZEeFIvJfYFi+HC2ho5mthorOzsNN p3tiMX6Rh4NP96nANN9HWvriWVhVrblx6LJKSEVrfygQpDx3MoxT2BoQKFsrwQnLRJKg2eQQg 0q2BAucrSVQgC38XRoB2K8SYXYVxw+yMl6o7iFIYucxdcwcn/ueesJNCoMfwiQQvSGpHD/Pn0 JhCd0ck/DQaozIUdXik1mzkHiKPGCqf6cgSgkYROaBBHGi3Bw9Z4kZImusvLRHLziXlHaZbGT NtFLGWRt7hoLh6JUKDf6rZ5y9yD9/peivskj7GoNhW4+Pdvslor6EXtAfmnhQ1oeAiw/j21IJ WfiV8JSG/GyB9msJGPcjw4UwF+R54AlMYvqCUvrlnYyGMr6EiCJH9W0eIGZL0NoY2VclcuX80 bqqFnk3s5SqSEowwKSD4+d5AEl+lrGTE5WqMtmoZpBm6Bc+xjZfXMo6mGe/ejXeBiq+f4W6zr 7x1xBIMTN7GPXoFpQvjbHOub7kroXOmtx/VnmnfRf4SoOQvgHCB5Qw6sA1G52qO3UAypyB3kF JloVK1eichPMW1AFmTdhr5aXCelXqoaf+rmsxnPMII0gUhd3to5JDtyn6ED44htgAp1oxfXW X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.18 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:213037 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: Hi Stefan, >> According to recent Tramp changes, binding `non-essential' in ido-mode >> is not needed anymore. I've removed the bindings. > > Fundamentally, I think that ido should bind non-essential somewhere so > as not to "accidentally" open up a new connection and ask for > a password, but given the way ido.el is structured it's not completely > clear how/where this should be done. So I think not binding > non-essential is good enough for now. I had the same feeling when removing the current bindings. But I'm not fluent with ido's code like many other people around here ... maybe we must wait for bug reports from ido users. > Thanks. > > Stefan Best regards, Michael.