From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27560: 26.0.50; seq-uniq is slow Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:50:27 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmp1r5ng.fsf@petton.fr> References: <8760farkxt.fsf@petton.fr> <87inj964oq.fsf@calancha-pc> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499089881 12101 195.159.176.226 (3 Jul 2017 13:51:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 13:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 27560@debbugs.gnu.org, ohwoeowho@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 03 15:51:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kw-0002lS-FL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 15:51:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35317 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1l0-0000on-AC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:51:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58239) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kp-0000of-8m for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:51:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kk-0007QD-Cb for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:51:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kk-0007Q8-5d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kj-0003FR-Uz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Nicolas Petton Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27560 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27560-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27560.149908983612451 (code B ref 27560); Mon, 03 Jul 2017 13:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27560) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Jul 2017 13:50:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kK-0003El-Hm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:50:36 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:51594) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dS1kI-0003EV-TD for 27560@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 03 Jul 2017 09:50:35 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87inj964oq.fsf@calancha-pc> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1499089828; bh=PhQ4AFWroj/NisBb9HsUMUXMvxiU1WUZjz0BAgu9Bi0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AL4viv5OlthA7oQv6XU4JflkFGo0lFjNi9dIB59aOAKJnZO9wITXIFX1G56PU9pm29dKEMpS1dHxpG+8kPArS1aTxh5DT++5wBJOKRMTWvmRJT6OGv27LSJ00uYALgYhKkV87MFSENd7prjfPrmrB9vDDMlVoqO6X7a0rUSUme8= X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134118 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Tino Calancha writes: > The numbers above are Oleh's numbers from 2015. Yes, but AFAIR `seq-uniq' hasn't changed since then. > If i run similar benchmarks now i don't get such impressive > difference between cl-lib/seq: Indeed, I will run some benchmarks as well. In your benchmarks, cl-lib is still much faster than seq-uniq, even if it's not as impressive as Oleh's benchmark. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZWkujAAoJECM1h6R8IHkQcv8H/j3+MY2GMwAOfx77HpPJlR3B LyOV72wGGAcyNH6o8Hsc5cMVLGDJGfv77TGhUw9BJFmfPVLA/MRFrdHO+Uswh4xv ZkVnUpuDzSMBl9gx7fuS842ttq+i+7zL989I5G5azq/E3nBgC74NqdCyMP67gJ7q j0WCNvzsdfCL65hZ4vj0SY0R1XT/dWImd5TWdDZ4m1vZfKm4m5s3qInE7RrtoVhv FvPtVPu3ePXd0txCSfoMyfloPvWDKjjJoOzbtsJFBJwYX1+L965QlR3wCrMI11/F XtPm8q8uQhnCMwVCloFPMN2ZR4tMpnBOC8Tr82WpfrAI9Dpq9rwS5/KIACzImLc= =eug5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--