* Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
@ 2017-07-12 11:53 Michael Alan Dorman
2017-07-12 12:08 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Alan Dorman @ 2017-07-12 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Given the following document:
* TODO Thingy
** TODO Sub-Thingy 1
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2017-07-12 Wed 07:15]--[2017-07-12 Wed 07:25] => 0:10
:END:
** DONE Sub-Thingy 2
:LOGBOOK:
CLOCK: [2017-07-12 Wed 07:25]--[2017-07-12 Wed 07:31] => 0:06
:END:
I would previously get a clocktable like (simulated):
#+BEGIN: clocktable
#+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2017-07-12 Wed 07:32]
| Headline | Time | |
|-----------------------+--------+------|
| *Total time* | *0:16* | |
|-----------------------+--------+------|
| TODO Thingy | 0:16 | |
| \_ TODO Sub-Thingy 1 | | 0:10 |
| \_ DONE Sub-Thingy 2 | | 0:06 |
#+END:
Starting with (I believe) org 9.05, I get
#+BEGIN: clocktable
#+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2017-07-12 Wed 07:32]
| Headline | Time | |
|------------------+--------+------|
| *Total time* | *0:16* | |
|------------------+--------+------|
| Thingy | 0:16 | |
| \_ Sub-Thingy 1 | | 0:10 |
| \_ Sub-Thingy 2 | | 0:06 |
#+END:
I don't see any note of this in ORG-NEWS, so I assume it's a
regression. I haven't had a chance to really dig into it yet.
Mike.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
2017-07-12 11:53 Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords Michael Alan Dorman
@ 2017-07-12 12:08 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2017-07-12 12:29 ` Michael Alan Dorman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2017-07-12 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Alan Dorman; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@jaunder.io> writes:
> Given the following document:
>
> * TODO Thingy
> ** TODO Sub-Thingy 1
> :LOGBOOK:
> CLOCK: [2017-07-12 Wed 07:15]--[2017-07-12 Wed 07:25] => 0:10
> :END:
> ** DONE Sub-Thingy 2
> :LOGBOOK:
> CLOCK: [2017-07-12 Wed 07:25]--[2017-07-12 Wed 07:31] => 0:06
> :END:
>
> I would previously get a clocktable like (simulated):
>
> #+BEGIN: clocktable
> #+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2017-07-12 Wed 07:32]
>
> | Headline | Time | |
> |-----------------------+--------+------|
> | *Total time* | *0:16* | |
> |-----------------------+--------+------|
> | TODO Thingy | 0:16 | |
> | \_ TODO Sub-Thingy 1 | | 0:10 |
> | \_ DONE Sub-Thingy 2 | | 0:06 |
> #+END:
>
> Starting with (I believe) org 9.05, I get
>
> #+BEGIN: clocktable
> #+CAPTION: Clock summary at [2017-07-12 Wed 07:32]
>
> | Headline | Time | |
> |------------------+--------+------|
> | *Total time* | *0:16* | |
> |------------------+--------+------|
> | Thingy | 0:16 | |
> | \_ Sub-Thingy 1 | | 0:10 |
> | \_ Sub-Thingy 2 | | 0:06 |
> #+END:
>
> I don't see any note of this in ORG-NEWS, so I assume it's a
> regression. I haven't had a chance to really dig into it yet.
This doesn't ring a bell. Anyway, the current behaviour sounds right,
since you can get TODO state with the "TODO" special property anyway.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
2017-07-12 12:08 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2017-07-12 12:29 ` Michael Alan Dorman
2017-07-12 12:36 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Michael Alan Dorman @ 2017-07-12 12:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolas Goaziou; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Thanks for your reply (and all the work you do on org), Nicolas.
> This doesn't ring a bell. Anyway, the current behaviour sounds right,
> since you can get TODO state with the "TODO" special property anyway.
But that will actually end up in another column, won't it?
As a bit of background: I have, historically, harvested the "Headline"
column for a weekly report, which depends on the state of the headline
being included---not including it there, even if it can be in a separate
column, dramatically decreases the utility of the clocktable for me
because it becomes a lot more work to produce that report.
Of course maybe the answer is that I should just write the elisp to
generate the report, but that's a big chunk of work, too. :()
For the moment, I guess I'll just stick with 9.05
Mike.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords
2017-07-12 12:29 ` Michael Alan Dorman
@ 2017-07-12 12:36 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2017-07-12 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Alan Dorman; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@jaunder.io> writes:
> But that will actually end up in another column, won't it?
It will.
> As a bit of background: I have, historically, harvested the "Headline"
> column for a weekly report, which depends on the state of the headline
> being included---not including it there, even if it can be in a separate
> column, dramatically decreases the utility of the clocktable for me
> because it becomes a lot more work to produce that report.
The TODO keyword would still be on the same line as the heading, only
a few columns away from the location. Honestly, I don't see why it would
be a lot more work to produce that report.
If you don't succeed in updating your code, you may want to post it here
so Org users can help you.
Regards,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-07-12 12:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-07-12 11:53 Regression? Clocktable no longer includes TODO keywords Michael Alan Dorman
2017-07-12 12:08 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2017-07-12 12:29 ` Michael Alan Dorman
2017-07-12 12:36 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.