tags 5615 + patch
quit

Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> writes:

> IRIE Shinsuke <irieshinsuke@yahoo.co.jp> writes:
>
>> Sorry, the patch I sent with previous mail is bad, because the previous
>> patch was made without considering `line-spacing' specified by a
>> floating point number or frame-parameter.
>>
>> So I wrote the new patch. Please check it.
>
> [...]
>
> Is this still a problem in the current Emacs?

Current Emacs still uses the same (1- (window-height)) expression, but I
can't understand from the description when exactly this gives the wrong
result.  Furthermore, I don't see any justification which would explain
why the new proposed significantly more complicated computation is more
correct.  I think we should just use window-text-height.