From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: git log question Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:10:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87bmjjd1li.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87bmjkgk6h.fsf@gmx.net> <83y3mn3gjc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512154771 9879 195.159.176.226 (1 Dec 2017 18:59:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2017 18:59:31 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 01 19:59:24 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eKqWv-0001uC-73 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 19:59:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59769 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKqX2-0001cf-Dp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:59:28 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32881) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKoNx-0000le-J0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:41:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKoNs-00086v-KJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:41:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:51406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eKoNs-00085X-9y; Fri, 01 Dec 2017 11:41:52 -0500 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([83.135.10.157]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lat5o-1enGSY3PI0-00kMKw; Thu, 30 Nov 2017 20:10:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <83y3mn3gjc.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:57:59 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:+mslJ98gqFwRgP/1/xXOWGOXONYUELjzYDOTmpLTaJ/AGK6IWRL cqzf8GcfX1wMrldyJ4nFcIbQFDfssctMyPnFIjcigexSW5kin8zbzioipiB328E9+GYT7TT 0qkF27PWpCmFlXG1MJyRZgQJppvU9qAdFH2qLHbOPEfmI8d6Alq2ewotwEgBx5AEEODr7s5 UidBl5XPW754vWwi0xwaA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:xIzFqqok90k=:o1CvqlxoxyLnA6DbIyt1+D dUuWaVgxSUWUjbQifPNpHuF+9JDGNsKfNVnByMnx+aft0McEGgJqk2yVkxd64pjSPgnE5JcuJ H57P1IVOTLJ1iPVQoUGVloYzfCKHNjqaGxKLT7I4v/tjeAp8h4QCXJ993fZQsLtBpD3dN5Rh9 CFsPTZlAvUWDutigJXm4/F9nm8ufZ+gjTdMPS5gPDtBs3DtJdJ8jY1Sb6cvhTHX2g0j8OFf2b Ir1HqkFi6QCInPjpKE+3J33t80YykZeEYIuoDovUj18xF3oV1VpmTlKAVc6/iBRhCL551bMqT Qwne0mHYaIF3XMa/9DN17ojKeHmY7CYo0LfzgTgGKYwo2+8nBHDNkGXAKQfHiYbLVIKz7HDSd ZdCLAv/TWTW+7AA4UngqbWAeWaZnannYVp66Ah5Fp1fL9BxwTpCB5ZiMFNlnFXsnHvW03+niH kyxgTeOF0lRhmZWwf5zLPWs7MWMMKfxlMFiOJoHLlQjh4BeoV9j/FhkDviUuU61FWl0HR15jZ u/L48Z6sSa+MzF38lVD4N6VgOkM7LA0zdZUs6qyosxN/If3WRG3ibGLJIn8mbPVUpSgQtKqMt MbJCTiE3iS+ZVdZsf3tgAoFMjmV4cMNgOmJ05lKVs84sT7u+tAJ3QFh9TYb8I9cbVDauwIQ3d 6NS/LGt+sFjSGJYj502pInNZ0e6ZcL9sz/YN1Utk5mpXab5PChaC2zSctzh+9Rvm8Gt+o3T2p XP45UzAiboCP3p4BK5IFC8FlEQbfw73dqa3jX9S6wAytr49LmdHsrhE2AdgPYhy8eKNgj0/X X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.22 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:220575 Archived-At: On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 17:57:59 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stephen Berman >> Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 11:00:54 +0100 >> >> I thought if I call `git log -1' on the current branch, it will >> only show if it is in the current branch, but I just discovered >> this is not so: I called it with master current and being one I >> knew was only in emacs-26, but nevertheless it showed that commit. > > Isn't that because we merge from emacs-26 to master, and that commit > was merged as part of that? No, this was prior to that commit being merged to master (cf. my example of a commit existing only on master but being shown when invoking `git log ' on emacs-26). Steve Berman