Re: Propagating local variables?

[Shea Levy <shea@shealevy.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 880 bytes --]

Maybe a good transition path is to add an explicit (opt-in) parent
buffer mechanism when creating a buffer, and adding a hook when a buffer
is created *without* explicitly setting the parent (or explicitly
setting it to null) so the user can plug their own heuristics in until
legacy modules catch up.

John Wiegley <johnw@gnu.org> writes:

>>>>>> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> * specify, when creating a buffer, what parent buffer (if any) it should
>> have.
>
>> I think the second way will be better controlled, because it won't depend on
>> heuristics.
>
> I think so too, except that it won't work well with legacy modules, if they
> weren't written with such inheritance in mind.
>
> -- 
> John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
> http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]