From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: A couple of questions and concerns about Emacs network security Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:30:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmbhle4c.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> References: <83o9g2uhju.fsf@gnu.org> <20180705115826.73c1d95e@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <878t6lom8g.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <87pnzxn4kw.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> <06fdac3c-a773-2c98-ade1-a1b7dd2d34ce@cs.ucla.edu> <87bmbhmx5l.fsf@mouse.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1531078133 8319 195.159.176.226 (8 Jul 2018 19:28:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2018 19:28:53 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Paul Eggert , Emacs-Devel devel To: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 08 21:28:49 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fcFMV-00022R-10 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:28:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38022 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcFOc-0003O1-7x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 15:30:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcFO1-0003L1-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 15:30:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcFNv-0007eV-Rl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 15:30:20 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:36748) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fcFNv-0007c2-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 15:30:15 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.212.221.165.getinternet.no ([84.212.221.165] helo=marnie) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fcFNr-00053u-VD; Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:30:14 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong's message of "Sun, 8 Jul 2018 19:54:16 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:227134 Archived-At: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong writes: > How about this, I'll be satisfied if we append :group 'nsm on the > gnutls defcustoms, so they show up on both the gnutls customize group > **and** nsm, and document in the docstrings the effects to NSM checks > if you mess with these GnuTLS settings? All the doc strings of the gnutls variables mention the NSM now. (After I remembered to push the changes to the emacs-26 branch that I wrote a couple of weeks ago. :-)) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no