From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Stephen Berman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tests involving post-command-hook Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:37:40 +0200 Message-ID: <87bmamz2i3.fsf@gmx.net> References: <87bmangip8.fsf@gmx.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1533127057 9776 195.159.176.226 (1 Aug 2018 12:37:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 12:37:37 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 01 14:37:33 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fkqNf-0002Qw-Dt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:37:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39674 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkqPm-0003qz-67 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:39:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54402) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkqO3-0003GR-JC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:37:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkqNy-0007LW-L7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:37:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:35477) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fkqNy-0007L1-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 08:37:50 -0400 Original-Received: from rosalinde ([84.63.9.49]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx103 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M6ioC-1g7tXW2Ucu-00wStZ; Wed, 01 Aug 2018 14:37:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:51:06 -0400") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:KnJnWo2Dr5EV+Rm00WQita+WQrwE3cRQApUEtXNVL3kE7rXjXNQ 1cpio3V4J7kFFW+DuhTRTOaVGUwR/IEpmW2wfYKgIysIMvVAbDBJKG8QEzNOGmhX/nqrQCO mKo0RLA6qBo94t14LUXs2a7fqcWNf+LFofm1ZaktC0S10/VAp6VSXnSMEslM7zzv6beiDun JAVyzMLLoe14hEsDvdL7A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:18355Kkwt7s=:Oq8cefMVKuGS8AILagQT5h 0v1uFBpvT8UynKbTqo2G1YCDh212GqmnWgC4QpmCiF74QpKzzE3oTomNrYqcmhhFU5xmO1z2U YKuJZF+PmQL89eLoNPkA9ZHS03ZG8g8ikDUrO4fwHbS7/fAwDXKlR497JA+P5/ExQfcj2wi55 c0KbhfiBt0x6hG5QPMMBNKrjPg/k86Tvd6PU59JncvxwUgtLwnt8EoqktvlsNzZlqK5NYyWEt p7IQtJ9LU7Zlls4CqIfxIwzrCUN65dpjybKTRGRhUF6uGvGMxLx5dZXQ9XVL8kueD3r93zdBr mWMK/d92D8HHkvfgu4Ad9i32n6j7Nn7NlAR9HURqFOqePDNXjg4DjoJGcrws68DArIOfr4G/v DZ+5sQuqofhDk4JJ7U21RmNepjvTCezukHQwyfHauy7DVc6TPQ4WTbaP6OSLWljuV/6Op3JM0 RF2ESf7QachCntdCh8yDeUnCWCSPe3WU0CRjgg74iDjpT16Y3Rxe7QgOkGQhDOzlLpQqLHlLF A4PdY8ILsRu0Vsnm3d6pL05n47tnV5/GprSjeK2LB/bPv7Zg8QLozIvxHmpgb+oF18yygeKoW NQ1wchqYXtRW/jI20BZUMNOHNLkUwa/ch6YXtDM3A+KDqdtddCCE7nUSrwEilELkqcGVld1pT fjt2DSvl2P3YxGOw7mpa77vZSMyahUwOf8xth1NId6Of+bEf3uJ0vCkwuOMD6gK8pew3fdMi+ qVhuSLyun4qIvr3UFj8/YCpXZuoHyevmq6AhsiqhDTzWJywkojbaHsLitjYJQ/R+xT6/DQYH X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.227.17.20 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:228082 Archived-At: On Wed, 01 Aug 2018 07:51:06 -0400 Stefan Monnier wrote: >> I'm using ERT to test for the hl-line face property and it appears that >> in the test environment, the function hl-line-highlight is not >> automatically run from post-command-hook as it should be, although I use >> call-interactively to mimic a command invocation. It works only if I > > pre/post-command-hook is run by the command *loop*, not by call-interactively. > > The command loop is the chunk of C code which does something like: > > (while t > (let ((keys (read-key-sequence))) > (run-hooks 'pre-command-hook) > (call-interactively (key-binding keys)) > (run-hooks 'post-command-hook) > (redisplay))) > > We don't want call-interactively to run those hooks, because commands > may internally call call-interactively themselves. My misunderstanding, thanks for clarifying. In any case, as Noam Postavsky pointed out, I can get the job done with ert-simulate-command. Steve Berman