From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] emacs-26 03bb7a8: Avoid clearing echo-area message
	by auto-save-visited-file-name
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:03:54 -0800
Message-ID: <87bm6bblfp.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net>
References: <20181126172847.31607.25553@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20181126172848.D835220427@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<jwvk1kzivnb.fsf-monnier+emacsdiffs@gnu.org> <83woozhfou.fsf@gnu.org>
	<871s77k5my.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83tvk3hbze.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87k1kzioot.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <83sgznh8jo.fsf@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1543266133 1819 195.159.176.226 (26 Nov 2018 21:02:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 21:02:13 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 26 22:02:09 2018
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17])
	by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1gRO1B-0000KW-70
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:02:09 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38891 helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1gRO3H-0006b4-Rb
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:04:19 -0500
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45588)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1gRO36-0006Zr-W9
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:04:11 -0500
Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1gRO32-00066Y-Gr
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:04:08 -0500
Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=40263 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1gRO32-00065z-A0
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 16:04:04 -0500
Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org>) id 1gRO0s-0008KL-Df
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:01:50 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Original-Lines: 13
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:SyFV89DwNxj2uetSlcrdl+fVYKk=
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic]
	[fuzzy]
X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:231419
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/231419>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Eric Abrahamsen <eric@ericabrahamsen.net>
>> Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 12:11:46 -0800
>> 
>> Well... I highly doubt I've seen something you haven't, but the
>> following seems to work correctly, doesn't it?
>
> How can I tell?

The "Hi!" message remains visible after the `map-y-or-n-p' call returns.
I thought that was the requirement -- if not, I didn't read the thread
carefully enough, and apologize for the derailment...