From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34756: 26.1.92; Minor typos across manuals Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:44:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87bm2pkq5f.fsf@tcd.ie> References: <87mum9u30u.fsf@tcd.ie> <83woldcn3y.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="60410"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 34756-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 05 21:45:28 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1h1GwJ-000FcC-FI for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:45:27 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49030 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1GwI-0003kB-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:45:26 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55944) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Gw9-0003jA-Et for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:45:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Gvz-0007zI-2T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:45:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:48212) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Gvw-0007we-U5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:45:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1Gvw-0007iB-IQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:45:04 -0500 Resent-From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:45:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 34756 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Mail-Followup-To: 34756@debbugs.gnu.org, contovob@tcd.ie, contovob@tcd.ie Original-Received: via spool by 34756-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D34756.155181866529562 (code D ref 34756); Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:45:04 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34756-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2019 20:44:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33519 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1GvI-0007gf-V2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:44:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-f46.google.com ([209.85.208.46]:46128) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h1GvE-0007gH-B9 for 34756-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 15:44:23 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-f46.google.com with SMTP id f2so8369283edy.13 for <34756-done@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:44:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tcd-ie.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=vw8gzm0yZ+puLGRCiFZIJyLJRnAkIIsk4p0OIjgnbPs=; b=zPulH0baB8z2yG6iUEFpKBKGdd8aQsEuRG/o4FACOFNg/ypkmJ8XAnD6R94k1mdy9l 6SkduvZ4N+dltdmpU6xyoyl/8AfZMVakePHeF4kiatsluXXMm9h2lvxcoLHen6gsUCUy +vXrSLOKXn6opcNzAjEJXVAkiTZ3naOxFEZXdbfg3BkyRwHb19DY7RrM8tfJZZ6Z+mdK h5p+LToDcrjmVq3e6K3+kgH5b777NWbgPpRQDpwOqCg5AWHosR/5e+BLJzlzbZWeHcoA da1g3HQ3B3s+Xqqbk5dG3FCbUi86FeNetYOfEMbEDwYf1Q7qBqqfWwi48+w9XzWuxJHg mySw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=vw8gzm0yZ+puLGRCiFZIJyLJRnAkIIsk4p0OIjgnbPs=; b=UG7gDxwdNB8mqVwfx9U+cJBBepCMSFW/j/yO5u+Cu+Li1M3ERWxG9V3Vcj5403z3em 5O4h7n0378eOX+D/iAChbRKFweAujoJFvVE09Z34yTJ9w89aArekOmXmMeJkJOttRW4L nkGmEi7Hmi2MrQOY+RjhFZ+ZQCWH+IF8pBX7O7U6599aG+OSDnM8xfkioUO8rHtc2ziF Xqdi0gA9Kaki6CavJLH2U0xG/mHP4NEl55/Kx7RMQ+5NbxcmxdBC4hySnYOW/WvfS9o0 YFlN8cEbWN/2r1QljtHpWSnN5w5HGWlgU1poMGHZYL9868BF2eyzQYrAvAnC8vneGB+0 DMVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV+zBVGsa7yf8FP32vDTx+nrPQMFMgBRVbmF3wfjP3r10tiv4wd VFUMeTNq8lQJ8dJe+ucK9gBtpA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy1+1idOwuttoLcLSBiNPat1ooLduIrLdxk7PpxWRMVZ0zxlI+ymRnJ2n21dXjvLeRoCfO3Pg== X-Received: by 2002:a50:9150:: with SMTP id f16mr20986923eda.96.1551818654469; Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:44:14 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([2a02:8084:20e2:c380:20c2:134e:4f3a:683a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d47sm3340032eda.77.2019.03.05.12.44.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 05 Mar 2019 12:44:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83woldcn3y.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 5 Mar 2019 18:17:05 +0200") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:156071 Archived-At: fixed 34756 26.2 quit Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: "Basil L. Contovounesios" >> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2019 08:41:21 +0000 >> >> Are the three attached patches acceptable for the emacs-26 branch? > > Documentation changes should always go to the release branch, unless > they document features only available on master. > >> If so, should I add this bug number to all or none of them? > > It's okay to push all of them under the same bug number, and even in a > single commit. There's no need to distinguish between changes that > correct typos, they are all "alike" for all practical purposes. Thanks for clarifying, I've now pushed to the release branch. Let me know if anything is amiss, e.g. if signed commits are frowned upon. -- Basil