From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Subject: Re: Survey: changing a few default settings for Org 9.4
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 22:11:18 -0600
Message-ID: <87blptzymx.fsf@alphapapa.net>
References: <87pnebf2ku.fsf@gnu.org> <84k14ikfee.fsf@gmail.com>
 <87zhde3iue.fsf@gnu.org> <84ftf6k90h.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45494)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4dEy-00049j-Jk
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:15:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4dEx-0007QA-Nq
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:15:08 -0500
Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([159.69.161.202]:50924)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4dEx-0007Pn-Ht
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Feb 2020 23:15:07 -0500
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1j4dEs-000Cy2-Nw
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Feb 2020 05:15:02 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
 <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Marco Wahl <marcowahlsoft@gmail.com> writes:

>>>> - org-loop-over-headlines-in-active-region => t
>>>
>>> I vote for => 'start-level.  Loop over headlines with same level as the
>>> first.
>>
>> Yes, good suggestion.
>
> Let's see what others say.

I can see how that could be useful, but I feel like it would be less
intuitive than looping over all headings in the region.  I would be
confused by that behavior if I weren't aware of this discussion and the
option's settings.  So I would vote for t over 'start-level.

My two cents.  :)