From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39181: 27.0.50; [PATCH] Allow users to store & restore gdb-mi layout Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 21:54:37 +0100 Message-ID: <87blp5jlki.fsf@gmail.com> References: <75FC69BA-CCD4-46D0-B9F5-109200C796F3@gmail.com> <55235252-FD03-4801-804A-864EFC1DCA0A@gmail.com> <90254CFF-2FFD-4D54-8467-717FF10166A2@gmail.com> <5c8d9f6a-0bc5-b2ff-1513-4b8631fee1a3@gmx.at> <2A945E3B-5506-4077-9C2E-AD049BCEFA23@gmail.com> <87zhcsyoee.fsf@gmail.com> <7DBBA6F5-4F53-48DC-A895-A0B06FF2A333@gmail.com> <2bc5d577-eded-c79c-5b05-c815ed8ac212@gmx.at> <87ftehjq0b.fsf@gmail.com> <150C19DE-ACA2-4066-AB25-DAB7DAD96774@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="15303"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/28.0.50 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Cc: 39181@debbugs.gnu.org To: Yuan Fu Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 09 21:56:04 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPRU-0003se-8p for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 21:56:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49686 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPRT-00017L-Bp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:56:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37173) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPQW-0000I3-P0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPQU-0001YN-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:55:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45536) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPQU-0001Xj-K6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:55:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPQU-00088i-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:55:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n_?= =?UTF-8?Q?N=C4=9Bmec?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39181 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39181-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39181.158378726831241 (code B ref 39181); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 20:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39181) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Mar 2020 20:54:28 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51509 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPPw-00087p-85 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:54:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com ([209.85.167.48]:33747) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jBPPu-00087Z-8w for 39181@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:54:26 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id c20so8971681lfb.0 for <39181@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vQE9591FsHS9oEkIelfmV7DphcKJNTiAMDIzOQuNbNM=; b=SpuXy5p33I7kcp/HRFHA1fbe4TrBYBkmtxpecYOPPdNKV5Fgw+bMWyqR7sGW1Q4kL+ ovChG0ygyWWo3FPNiKo0EXUbVG15HO1MO3wtD3Amt/qgXb2rqqrJKtMGuFme5nHq92yf 1SM0EfEXZIpYOqb2e4OWvJu5DTd6h2QDtgaqz8O0h++zNlE7iWnf2Ieot2LRSXvUoA7l vvabBKTBHf3Z5ym4gzm0d84hFFZK3qMysyxykcMXQwAMZr1g8FN0xHvduqQhMBugVhw6 1JBduw+m+zYydLhchbHNn4tmmCi/Vxlj9gQAMGrlQtNy8ezRbmnmaV3RNAhjI7Z0YI5H YxFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=vQE9591FsHS9oEkIelfmV7DphcKJNTiAMDIzOQuNbNM=; b=XzHxrY/Z+0N527A4Wj5uX+xcOnsTyU/9edmPeZjqEwYXgoZesW6yp/MK8iLm7YjaDH AYsbWY0Tc5r5EBPTg/hY1ZXrMs7Hc5l7j4JrUYWW9x6V+WgRGFiIZYsfkAXcFpMn1uaA KUXa6Mb2sEaTrqxgOyv6Qz0exJFL6Qwcg+6ayvXShvFyuR88nP4yCiWxzN6DlXT0F0TC mVLKuTzweSr08lLaGn7pCEaTTvciGzog6Y7LdyZyX+afFuBrOOf5EEzP0TKmWcU71npe Us9cVRT+aBC4alyJJQ1wK+Cdgic5mdn/rxZGxyj1CFthbuklWjYND4tlyzRSfSXW2nY3 LkyQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ0bZQSy4TX2k5hNG27AxBjR6HujN5DfIG9PWS1UyRM1geOSXOEC SA4iZdIezl8r9Ca2vfed/Vo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvbFsyOZxTAfbJPCIcgUm2j+4qq2y+sp6nAFgkkCJ/Y9nRGdGFYNjKFPMqCmeaMxfb9LkcAmA== X-Received: by 2002:a19:6b09:: with SMTP id d9mr10766886lfa.203.1583787260164; Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:54:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([185.112.167.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y6sm7534736lfc.24.2020.03.09.13.54.19 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Mar 2020 13:54:19 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <150C19DE-ACA2-4066-AB25-DAB7DAD96774@gmail.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:177109 Archived-At: On Mon, 09 Mar 2020 16:17:59 -0400 Yuan Fu wrote: >> On Mar 9, 2020, at 3:18 PM, =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n N=C4=9Bmec wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >> Other than the nit picks below, I have one question: is there any >> difference between "window layout" and "window configuration" in this >> context? You seem to be using both interchangeably, both in >> documentation and the function/variable names. There seems to be some >> prior usage of "layout" in gdb-mi, but the general Emacs term AFAIK is >> "configuration". Wouldn't it make sense to unify the usage somewhat, at >> least in the new code? Just an observation (I found it confusing.) >>=20 > > No, not really, that=E2=80=99s my fault. Before I go in and change every = word, > which one do you think I should use: configuration or layout? > Configuration is the conventional Emacs term but I felt that layout is > easier to understand for a user. If you are find with both I guess I > will change all to configuration. If they mean the same thing, then I'd say "configuration" is definitely the way to go. It is true that some Emacs terms might be unfamiliar to new users, but thanks to the excellent documentation capabilities it's very easy to learn the respective definitions (e.g., in this case 'C-h r i configuration' will display the relevant manual entries). It is important to stay consistent. --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n