From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44638: [PATCH 1/2] autorevert: don't reuse existing watch descriptors Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:20:01 +0100 Message-ID: <87blfcdt1a.fsf@gmx.de> References: <20201114165459.9518-1-sbaugh@catern.com> <835z67vooa.fsf@gnu.org> <878sb3myb8.fsf@catern.com> <874kl6iv08.fsf@catern.com> <838saik8n9.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtyyg0hd.fsf@gmx.de> <875z5lffja.fsf@gmx.de> <83ft4ohp1s.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0u0dyqa.fsf@gmx.de> <83360ogqqf.fsf@gnu.org> <87ft4odtpc.fsf@gmx.de> <831rg8gmh4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29877"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: sbaugh@catern.com, 44638@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 02 18:21:30 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVoo-0007fJ-PY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:21:30 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36330 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVon-000407-LN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:21:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVoM-0003z9-46 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53894) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVoL-0007Vo-SU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:21:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVoL-0004Ob-PG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:21:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Michael Albinus Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:21:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44638 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 44638-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44638.160692961316816 (code B ref 44638); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:21:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44638) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2020 17:20:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37207 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVnZ-0004NA-E2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:20:13 -0500 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:37069) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kkVnX-0004Mw-WD for 44638@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:20:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1606929603; bh=zb4a/Rf6kiBj8ai3iq0drHA9AyPYN+cEeJIjNfOrJyw=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Date:In-Reply-To; b=UWM9sPbxKDIcKyzRhoRN6eTumqFZwcywM4j3pu92Fsk+eawbK1ak1GDgTd3+CeSuR vmUASiWeOZMz5x0br3c+pHGlWkSOiUEdiQzwa9XRJTYoz0Ko28rLuWHeYPPOIsk3y8 z9xdKlOeaJiznpIXWR00IdCvZhm2UK4mkn3ij/Ss= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from gandalf.gmx.de ([212.86.45.36]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1MQe5u-1kVboS42A2-00Nl8l; Wed, 02 Dec 2020 18:20:03 +0100 In-Reply-To: <831rg8gmh4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 02 Dec 2020 19:13:27 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:DKLvaBHSCdKY5J9GeI5hvCksHq6HPpzwMSxH7DyKQFne5zfNeL+ fN84zVCpKLm6NbPgbuX4wijvGZaa2X9HpTagV9G87Ki8F6A78Gu9ujTOyx48rZQfbgWSgvF Heg9S87GWuC4LP+vN566kb64WHFjPfDuD1ha/xyKFv8jzO3dLt+3tyS+swO7ENElAfkaLjl 9DCRLbXZY962CKYrB+XwA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:tpnA+MsH2Ek=:AvowYOvrVE7i9/c4rQk92R gOLYs8diNqJamy2CpWeDmkoeT4CU4GyIjrl3XDgc+sjqWpd9jEPE5ezQzniNSD8xDyZJ0CM8t Lhdpp6NzFYQt5o3EIt+hUygMzEptV+/qsIgyafaJfRv24EP6bqkUe3QXviYJrbi3K5mbqP2Yp 60o1mYapIyyTISPoiBvlXBVoFIigtQYbWLi82uom8EzvHj2+90w1hv0EbmZna0HXjiXfeWREQ 9GawxTksCFy+pr29z5l/jWD8bVPZsvWILVcAnYQ9X+smjfpJKI/uZsyLRmL9cn9u6trFF7O0v oh21DukBqQW5XRDjO6lOOjLdsGnSxcMh7PFv5mAKxxSVDUt15P52PNrv5t8Nlj9+2J/Duh1tL c6jSMe7s2Y/laKR+3Pk4HDTP3b2mjN4NviMlZxvY37/otJ2dkDQhv/kG43OdLywo1Z3V4q/rK I+qZHNTqK541WxDItpoEZx7Iw9jHD0k6lg7Bl/w8k867bl3fSYHoFNHOnTkX7pDcpdtFMp3V8 wAi1kAjZvU0WYBJk8E3TyqU+kxLE5YnEzbw5D4zBwyWkHM3MrQV30zCOtLdrIqB0+Bd+qXn6n 250fMVAuAnBmoHroRDn1xO8TXw7/jKC22PA3PHJdtqm5MbP1yYtkgr4fkPc15rPnL0bRn2jrm 6jQXB3Y1DiiN5ZvkRQ+2fecI9cPcxbuGjIivvmgSuoYEgmyY8d1W/4kYlMi+9YWPUu7tflW4V SQmXK9TxM7PoIdyBOl2sJeRZBSqhBZVvFgeqZQiK/n653uyc8lKnoBefVRLC9sQVJqAV6q63 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:194816 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > auto-revert-test07-auto-revert-several-buffers succeeds. Running the >> > entire test finds 2 failures: >> > >> > 2 unexpected results: >> > FAILED auto-revert-test04-auto-revert-mode-dired >> > FAILED auto-revert-test05-global-notify >> > >> > Let me know if I can help you more. >> >> Well, if the same errors happen also w/o that patch, I believe we are >> safe to install the patch in master. > > Yes, I think those tests always failed for me. Good, so I will install patch 1/2 in master. Likely tomorrow. >> In general, I need to debug what happens, the ert reports are not >> sufficient (for me) to understand what's going wrong. Do you know how t= o >> get an MS Windows VM instance? I would be even willing to pay for a >> license. > > Sorry, I don't know. maybe someone else here does. Hmm. What would be the canonical address to ask Microsoft directly? Best regards, Michael.