From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sergey Organov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Should (buffer-list) ever return killed buffers? Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 21:09:37 +0300 Message-ID: <87bl90uhpa.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> References: <87wnrpujo0.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <871r9w5jws.fsf_-_@osv.gnss.ru> <83a6okdx60.fsf@gnu.org> <6381ce45-24d5-90f7-c490-7006460f7f43@gmx.at> <835yz8dvfk.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnroxi4d.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> <8335ucdrpq.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6327"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, cpitclaudel@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 24 20:14:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llF5e-0001No-Iw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 20:14:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:33270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llF5d-0002ll-KY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:14:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llF1M-0007rf-Ch for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]:35618) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llF1K-00069m-Pg; Mon, 24 May 2021 14:09:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id f12so34804238ljp.2; Mon, 24 May 2021 11:09:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=0oUeLNA5KnxkL4OmrKk7w5tz8QmOLkCD6EQ8FS2HAqo=; b=A0MmZMcwNB7Ot9lsBJqwIfbTxKZ/yPg+n1RW1mfxLAuBWv9PdBHd00X/8LT1s0horw d+aKZqMOqVD6p5C5xqcTGJO6wUHaXOtDFsqFZaIc+RxKj/eG1BwwE5D7IU7BTBcJ8FNk JgkS3WU7vrwc+4VAnIDfa7oMyjUprSTnss0CSLnWGnj//QMkMCyJnHCqjMfDb4HYT9ye ezemDgcR3OItZXSl5b0oBzOFtZLfwf7IsTsjp3BYizkV5wrh60mac5HIrEtQ+zgT1eoW 1dxg/dDcT5ww3f3RBYf/OJSqM1ZreYyZWlemqMqeRoTReneM7eJV9+AY5L1TlPUMtMbB MFSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=0oUeLNA5KnxkL4OmrKk7w5tz8QmOLkCD6EQ8FS2HAqo=; b=Zz/a1pgAuT7kr0JH47ONunemDZx40YV/nYO7Mqhf9bHKGCQPLoxLxsXFy+vuvv3vhs ZcR9AIzbU4XbAE3HbzzRhoG+EPphbO58xj3gWVi0BD2b0AajtoXsWsRFRYj6/f1xddJf mGoK/+IBlWt7bcP4v8+IH/H12Bb+29RnDb2Z0E/nn+jHPnczwtnKONMjjGme2ZvQk56P JPYhuVt1kBoblmL3yT/pd/OvLlJBjHRn/eRRFbMsuNoIScwecCUkqJ6Ww3fRlX9GUngB X5Akmgf7QhfmVkZCI80rOa4uF/KemTe5Yt2Al2Bttg6aGT3rrQhD719G3dXICRKUxOJ+ ZMNA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530dJH4RydwHp4egVJSX2zWKrpAiaoHXZkieLXXtncvwuOrS7jm5 wV0CbC7XbdlikR3kTLY3UQBGTYd0F7g= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx4vm4NFlZG0SxQAqG780ETTpxSkL3NUOzI30c37swWKZ+QfSRLm3bCu8JPg7O+s8hRHkTcSg== X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:553:: with SMTP id q19mr17516684ljp.335.1621879779515; Mon, 24 May 2021 11:09:39 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from osv.localdomain ([89.175.180.246]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m21sm1606156ljh.12.2021.05.24.11.09.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 24 May 2021 11:09:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8335ucdrpq.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 24 May 2021 19:25:21 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::22a; envelope-from=sorganov@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x22a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -10 X-Spam_score: -1.1 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FREEMAIL_REPLY=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269789 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Sergey Organov >> Cc: martin rudalics , cpitclaudel@gmail.com, >> monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 18:32:18 +0300 >> >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >> > Then why not use buffer-live-p? >> >> Cause aref is choking on bufname being nil, I think. What if >> representation of killed buffers change? > > Whatever the representation of killed buffers, a buffer with a name of > nil will never be alive. Is there a fundamental law that prohibits this? ;-) That said, I believe you guys know better how to handle this, I just provided raw approximation for the fix, for convenience. Thanks, -- Sergey Organov