From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52205: Allow configuring multiple mail accounts for smtpmail.el Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:57:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87bl1cyi8k.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87fsrdmnqx.fsf@posteo.net> <87lf15arwk.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl20bswc.fsf@posteo.net> <87k0gogmgn.fsf@gnus.org> <87pmqg13qp.fsf@posteo.net> <87bl20f4zn.fsf@gnus.org> <87fsratxmq.fsf@posteo.net> <87wnklwtlw.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfv8u41f.fsf@posteo.net> <87ee6s6vow.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee6g71m1.fsf@posteo.net> <87v8zrpam8.fsf@gnus.org> <87bl1eqb5l.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29951"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: 52205@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 19 11:58:40 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1myttn-0007d7-RM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:58:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53180 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myttm-0000kT-AS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:58:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:43376) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myttC-0000GN-Dh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33309) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1myttC-0002rp-4u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:58:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myttB-0005OQ-VO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:58:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2021 10:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52205 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52205-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52205.163991148120723 (code B ref 52205); Sun, 19 Dec 2021 10:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52205) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Dec 2021 10:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44855 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1myttA-0005OB-RC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:58:01 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]:39846) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mytt9-0005Nx-Lq for 52205@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 05:58:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BVHgG6YhRN5TDTrdJ2CSjbZoXGAj3ZSwLbNqEc0RM3Q=; b=Ohmap1/skFKhmK4X3XB6YDNuw1 1pkiSPSnLLCXhtJvSSrBc/N7LWYMwPrdvM3hl0raMoeISGioHIuJ0/lIG0nt0Bj/o67+8FY3oumb4 whzKGyPCpz5ht3gT7xRPGmH+v0gez9uCUFIQDgiw0LkXFOqDLI4L6ZeMfRsgCchD2bps=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mytt0-0002wx-EF; Sun, 19 Dec 2021 11:57:53 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAD1BMVEVFOiAwKx1bUz6V inH///+pG/jHAAAAAWJLR0QEj2jZUQAAAAd0SU1FB+UMEwojLIznq7UAAAGGSURBVDjLnZPrcQMx CISR3AAoDSDUwBn67y2L7qXYTn5EMx7r+A4WaTmiz6tQkY/rT0AkwvOJy9wxgju4C59/EzC91iE5 wIsOH4A+SKP+HwC9mKUcq1o169nZARxPwkyEuOoCYoM+cdUKpBmZQCTChIpV1TJs2zUoxSOUhpmb sSNjEa/mIwYS+SpFEwRiYSOsmW+XRinDFcEijyy3LRkDFbxLrVAZNyDRlpta1chiO8+BX7e8CCsM gAyZgImpOU0gjP5OkM6MEf248lJvwAUn6KcZdwbjlvyMS9ULoK3dEryBKWiXeHqrGX94Z37eGpfj A/Va30dpip/kiazQ3eo5R4vZLVz0rRRanVoHOLYEG0Yt+7gd7e7T5/lC7XcGZ//CzfnIXUoVw7nc Wio84hSH82K9cDy/UK21Ua5rh4P25OEcZRVHzRIQHSZjg2Gst4YY3BqeJV+AWm8VQN4BpiOgldkr CE3glN+A0wpiDqiXdHjNGDYwapPVH6Xe13/AryuHZ7/Jn+sbputMyAgJJFsAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6 Y3JlYXRlADIwMjEtMTItMTlUMTA6MzU6NDMrMDA6MDAH3KJMAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAy MDIxLTEyLTE5VDEwOjM1OjQzKzAwOjAwdoEa8AAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Now-Playing: John and Beverley Martyn's _The Road to Ruin_: "Tree Green" In-Reply-To: <87bl1eqb5l.fsf@posteo.net> (Philip Kaludercic's message of "Sat, 18 Dec 2021 13:45:42 +0000") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222639 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: >>>> Or we could add a command like `message-update-smtp-method-header' and >>>> people could call that (or add it to their hooks) after altering their >>>> From (or whatever) headers. >>> >>> So if the mechanism is supposed to be kept general (instead of just >>> checking the From header), how would this differ from the already >>> existing message-send-mail-hook? >> >> How a command would differ from a hook? I'm not sure I understand the >> question. > > Oh, sorry I misunderstood your suggestion. So you are thinking of > something that would be configured like: > > ;; `message-server-alist' would match the From header[0] if it is a string, > ;; or call a function in the current message buffer if it is a function. > (setq message-server-alist > '(("foo@mail.com" . "smtp.mail.com") > ("bar@post.de" . "post-spuep.de"))) > > (add-hook 'message-send-mail-hook #'message-update-smtp-method-header) No, I meant: >>>> Or we could add a command like `message-update-smtp-method-header' and >>>> people could call that > If so, then couldn't the add-hook just be dropped, and message always > checks message-server-alist before sending a message? Yes. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no