From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#54562: 28.0.91; Emoji sequence not composed Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 17:59:46 +0200 Message-ID: <87bkxosqa5.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bkxu8k7t.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87y20y6ypi.fsf@yahoo.com> <83pmmab53s.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfr66sb7.fsf@yahoo.com> <87a6deunjj.fsf@gmail.com> <87k0ch5x8k.fsf@yahoo.com> <83h77lb6km.fsf@gnu.org> <871qyod5d5.fsf@gnus.org> <87zglc2q14.fsf@yahoo.com> <87y20vtor6.fsf@gmail.com> <87a6db2ajo.fsf@yahoo.com> <87mthatt5h.fsf@gmail.com> <838rsu9twq.fsf@gnu.org> <875ynytfce.fsf@gmail.com> <837d8e9q6x.fsf@gnu.org> <871qymt96j.fsf@gmail.com> <834k3i9i1y.fsf@gnu.org> <87o81prq93.fsf@gmail.com> <83sfr17zkg.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0ccsti5.fsf@gmail.com> <83mth8935g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28296"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, larsi@gnus.org, 54562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 29 18:01:04 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEHI-0007BN-HT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:01:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40564 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEHH-00078b-HJ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:01:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60718) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEGJ-00077F-14 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:00:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39539) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEGI-00059o-NA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:00:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEGI-0007sn-21 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 12:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Robert Pluim Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 54562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54562.164856959630256 (code B ref 54562); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 16:00:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 54562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Mar 2022 15:59:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33436 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEGB-0007rv-Nk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:59:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f54.google.com ([209.85.221.54]:45991) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nZEG9-0007rh-Ut for 54562@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 11:59:54 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f54.google.com with SMTP id w4so25456579wrg.12 for <54562@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:59:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version; bh=snD+94hKMxw7hFk7f+K/jeP5j9Fn64/HP1wLCTzs45A=; b=pG0EUIgo51XAetN/qpRl8wJ/1QNWwNU2bD4BToD46vi8qry6Qn9pwokQWdOtJO2RNh crt2nQIInQPC6SLpXtUgFmmtF7Vqlf/Cqhky6XlqlwUbf/nF6gL5pGCNK9LGvLMH3zdS D7nGv19bm9pkpltJbQqqAbwYrLVgLgGq46mEXu0xsssXoFTSI2frrrcfNIDvq/2zMiGT 5JxG/YtIKhl2atZ0lqPCbYKgI+DPJJvsQaYq/xx/mBaLM8LaStag0TKq07ILZy96hbdu gXr3+SF4AJ7vApSc2EAwlPyv3zFZWSoAvwJBAaMB9xheXcatMNpRGAh/pxhf/dcOt2wY NjCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version; bh=snD+94hKMxw7hFk7f+K/jeP5j9Fn64/HP1wLCTzs45A=; b=RwA8M3w5zdTX/pQCR8FiFcVjL+niPWumwyJjnS3zEeyfavtkraC69NHr3IktitEADt TFAt1ckeNo5yPY9bqtpK6oyPwfvC4g2prFGgstTSiFq1bucDy0PMNWmFy8XXxUFXFkfj PfcJwSUqiT8aVBBjtds/+bHZFtATsptvjx7qDOHdll+/Mv/mOUluOFxIN4gYVHalexhp MNNNJipweEZais/OlA2ZtDOweC6/bbFreqc8T/cr7PoWgZSb8vUf0L1I41+M8vuBr+Ke ctgNd3eW7vJtKMGntZHP+Zp5a2n2ZHN7JMMIj9NNOma6cwxq0fCrT9Qmos4gLaLV+V7g 9lqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530d3Jwhco/MNFp7HV3D4SFZM+xQrKqMfx4uGMFvISK2ozLY4TaK LOasDoys+RlJZei4wwkUmty3+biN+eI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtFkR1nPIAA2+KR17P+xfbQEL0+f9HsBCnicBBayBZMs7PBd2nUTVo6b+AONH7x/sz9G0FAw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f846:0:b0:205:91f1:6035 with SMTP id d6-20020adff846000000b0020591f16035mr30273330wrq.629.1648569587635; Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:59:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from rltb ([2a01:e0a:3f3:fb50:33bd:4493:f280:6818]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r4-20020a1c2b04000000b0038a0e15ee13sm2694319wmr.8.2022.03.29.08.59.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 29 Mar 2022 08:59:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83mth8935g.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:42:03 +0300") X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:229067 Archived-At: >>>>> On Tue, 29 Mar 2022 18:42:03 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: >> From: Robert Pluim >> That might work. What would the fallback look like? Suppose we have 4 >> diacritics, 3 of which are covered by the same font, and one by a >> different one. Would you prefer to attempt to use the font of 3 of >> them, or would you prefer to fall back to the font of the base >> character? Eli> I think I'd prefer to have the font that covers the majority. OK. Btw, the limit is a 3-character lookback, not 4 (although I guess we could always raise it). Eli> But I'm not sure it's a real-life dilemma. I fully expect a font that Eli> supports the rare diacritic to also support the less rare ones. And Eli> if I'm wrong, I'm sure we will hear about that soon enough ;-) That we will. Robert --