From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Manuel Giraud Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to walk a Lisp_String? Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:07:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87bkrx6ci4.fsf@elite.giraud> References: <87a67jw1kw.fsf@elite.giraud> <83o7vzqey8.fsf@gnu.org> <83mtbjqemd.fsf@gnu.org> <87ler2963r.fsf@elite.giraud> <838rn2qnsf.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnam6y70.fsf@elite.giraud> <831qsuqllo.fsf@gnu.org> <87bkry6tnr.fsf@elite.giraud> <83tu5qoxol.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtbi57i2.fsf@elite.giraud> <87h71qj5x6.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="35729"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (berkeley-unix) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 02 17:08:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oU8HI-000971-MK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 17:08:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50080 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU8HH-0008Fa-J0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 11:08:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU8Gf-0007Te-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 11:07:37 -0400 Original-Received: from ledu-giraud.fr ([51.159.28.247]:16593) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oU8Ge-0002WM-6A; Fri, 02 Sep 2022 11:07:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; s=rsa; bh=D6u/QEExP9PwnMv9 5+NUfCJSnYPI68vSmILsWi/V20s=; h=date:references:in-reply-to:subject: cc:to:from; d=ledu-giraud.fr; b=lqDMsJMnie8XjZ0og7rXv94j1vbZAPl0WHZ2h0 pn3ktHjhlFg0CBooNlSI2nr6I823ZcA1cwJUHphaxvBkuIKpFWVFkRhGPOw+s2Fly2iEFh Bwx69BYRyeRjT62s+y08ghfoIInYCqkkZzRsEPJuDDXaSKnVSyDhPq5tfVBKXW6JM1Ml07 +CC3K3GjwQoZtRTE7IMlO/ZpjrTZ0MAo1b8DDIlhxbms+bXzqia5GFVspZIqUysLnyNoky fc88p7XaH17b8P2l/trvcDNcwo3Fu232N5BIN89VymV3hQce8qQnqHLq4RmYT6v6x74LgG twBAeagFTf6LI4RBQ25FQQOw== Original-Received: from elite.giraud ( [10.1.1.1]) by ledu-giraud.fr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 8dffca7d (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 2 Sep 2022 17:07:33 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87h71qj5x6.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Fri, 02 Sep 2022 20:51:17 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=51.159.28.247; envelope-from=manuel@ledu-giraud.fr; helo=ledu-giraud.fr X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294559 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > Manuel Giraud writes: > >>> At least, yes. And then I'd expect the currently active >>> (a.k.a. "selected") menu item to have a different face from the other >>> items, so that the active menu item stands out on display and provides >>> a visual feedback for the user moving the mouse to select menu items. >> >> You're right. I guess that I'd have to introduce a menu-selected face. >> But from where I am now, it will at a final stage. > > That feedback is provided by the Lucid menu widget, not through faces. Yes. > We want to make the Lucid menu widget display multilingual text > correctly by using the Emacs fontset machinery, not to make it define > menu text appearance through faces. Why not both? Having multilingual text handled correctly in menu is a goal but while here, I'd also like to be able to change the default menu face from within emacs and have menus recomputed correctly. Do you think it is attainable? -- Manuel Giraud