From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ihor Radchenko Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Choice of bug tracker Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 10:18:12 +0000 Message-ID: <87bkemrycb.fsf@localhost> References: <87il9kksqz.fsf@dfreeman.email> <83a5udlj47.fsf@gnu.org> <87a5udk1co.fsf@posteo.net> <835y51kslv.fsf@gnu.org> <7a82c524-1aa1-e755-e377-673ebb107a44@gutov.dev> <83r0nok8s4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ledwk4xi.fsf@gnu.org> <76ecf629-a41a-f6e4-f661-2ef926326d6c@gutov.dev> <83zg2cias7.fsf@gnu.org> <83pm37ie54.fsf@gnu.org> <831qfmhyx3.fsf@gnu.org> <245de638-e6b2-dd8e-ee61-695c4c3da0c7@gutov.dev> <83h6oghixu.fsf@gnu.org> <6ae0b4b0-b2ef-d8de-caed-d647979c2f37@gutov.dev> <83ttsfel30.fsf@gnu.org> <8f500cee-f136-fdc6-aaa5-960bbeceeaae@gutov.dev> <87zg26gy9i.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36774"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Dmitry Gutov , Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , Michael Albinus , philipk@posteo.net, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Visuwesh Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Sep 01 12:18:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1EO-0009NG-Cm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 12:18:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1Di-0001xu-Ox; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1Dg-0001xS-QD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qc1De-0002gf-5q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Sep 2023 06:17:40 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C419240027 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:17:36 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1693563456; bh=f4H2d99tyv7N1xDITYgwpoVcYIAVajw+NbF+o2k53z8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Transfer-Encoding:From; b=qKvTBiInmnB+BPDYoQa3n3yXzcSdSxXMV6vPWkl61fCLzJO4uXS2t7oklVDJl50as UTKmrWknjn4g59SsOEQWcGW5m5E2okYlCiEvaENPhMs7HJ4ut5MiTGU+dqre0wCZeK Qf7cHR3AHDVeA7GWdeonhfCtyHpXh0eEa4HuzXWw1Y2GxXqqF7c5NJikn+KXJG64NM mc9kGIyQOdymrMI0drDUo7BszaX1KGXUJPOe+uNqMZd9/WC4YhYe1UHMr58s2zidEh G97YGw8j8VYnnNFdbre3JPGYju5s5kg3iMPwefzdpbIbtqLoQ9JvRWyehbuFzqJO6K GITxNhxA4Atxg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4RcYqy53pyz9rxR; Fri, 1 Sep 2023 12:17:34 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87zg26gy9i.fsf@gmail.com> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:309751 Archived-At: Visuwesh writes: > I did not have problems with sending the mail to the right address but > knowing whether my mail reached the mailing list/debbugs was an issue > since I could not see it pop up in the bug-gnu-emacs mailing list > archive. Much later I learnt that there is a manual approval process > for fresh email addresses and that's why my acknowledgement mail was > sent some 10 hours later (I went to sleep after submitting said bug > report). If there was a message along the lines of, =E2=80=9CYour messag= e has > been received and will be forwarded to the Emacs developers once your > email address has been manually approved to check whether your mail is > spam or not=E2=80=9D I think the first experience would have been smoothe= r. Agree. Isn't is possible to create an automatic bouncer for non-subscribed non-whitelisted users to notify them about moderation? --=20 Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at