From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Colin Baxter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please, Restore Previous Behavior for jump-to-register Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:04:29 +0000 Message-ID: <87bkaw33qq.fsf@yandex.com> References: <87h6kr9817.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5qi1vui.fsf@posteo.net> <87bkayjoga.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <83wmtmumud.fsf@gnu.org> <874jgq0zdh.fsf@posteo.net> <25974.5401.926181.432049@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <25974.24010.49674.989981@retriever.mtv.corp.google.com> <83lea0vs8w.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: m43cap@yandex.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20124"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/30.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org, raman@google.com, joaotavora@gmail.com, thievol@posteo.net, eduardoochs@gmail.com, ams@gnu.org, schwab@linux-m68k.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com, tino.calancha@gmail.com To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 11 21:05:41 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmX6-0004y1-D5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 21:05:40 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmWF-0005zf-Q7; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:04:47 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmWC-0005zP-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: from forward502c.mail.yandex.net ([2a02:6b8:c03:500:1:45:d181:d502]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmW9-0006L9-9Q; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 15:04:44 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-36.sas.yp-c.yandex.net (mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-36.sas.yp-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c14:208b:0:640:abaa:0]) by forward502c.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 1298C60EBA; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:04:34 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: by mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-36.sas.yp-c.yandex.net (smtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id U4oIjs4GgSw0-fc7ixC8U; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 23:04:33 +0300 X-Yandex-Fwd: 1 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1702325073; bh=61Qt4FH51GeOTm2HvKgcixKu6J/tPvfDa/lRYp3vWV0=; h=Message-ID:References:Date:Reply-To:Cc:In-Reply-To:Subject:To: From; b=l/DdS7vMfNwOPbVh6+t+YCuhmH/fif3yO9RZRPEFqWf7eec04yUgtuwc9bsArovZ+ fkXiD7VxhhhKYKAwkmnwJMdwg28n7Ss9Pgnhigrf5GWlbQbThRjZxGTUzyezxUOtPk embkhfqEcdvdTiCjo779ToxVOuGyBcqkqRPQf9ck= Authentication-Results: mail-nwsmtp-smtp-production-main-36.sas.yp-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com In-Reply-To: (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:16:01 +0200") X-Face: BHjiJOg/Qmj'BQgsAKL@])L)e62P)C"Y=6T Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAAEkAAAATAgMAAAChCMjeAAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAACVBMVEX/zAABCWP///8I RHjYAAAAAWJLR0QCZgt8ZAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB+cLEg8fIcA6dmIA AAAbSURBVBjTY2BgCA1hYA0FAxDDgQEERsXoIAYA2F9Eb3cpB+AAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6Y3JlYXRl ADIwMjMtMTEtMThUMTU6MzE6MzMrMDA6MDA6s2aEAAAAJXRFWHRkYXRlOm1vZGlmeQAyMDIzLTEx LTE4VDE1OjMxOjMzKzAwOjAwS+7eOAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:6b8:c03:500:1:45:d181:d502; envelope-from=m43cap@yandex.com; helo=forward502c.mail.yandex.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313713 Archived-At: >>>>> Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 11/12/2023 14:27, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> I'm also interested to hear arguments why should the new behavior >> be the default, if there are people who think the new behavior is >> better in some circumstances. > FWIW, the recent blog post (setting aside its overall tone) > sparked at least two discussions: on Reddit and on Hacker News. > And among comments there, I noticed a few saying something like > "this could make registers usable for me". > And the idea of prompting when overriding a register seems good > for default behavior, at least in theory. > Take this with a armful of salt, since I'm one of those that never > used registers, though this change (a better, visual preview) > might make them more attractive for me too. Whether that can make > them a regular tool, is still to be seen. I'm pleased you wrote this because I too have never used registers. Having now tried point-to-register for the first time, I think it will prove to be very useful. Perhaps experienced users don't need it, but I especially like the confirmation provided by the visual preview. Colin Baxter.